#94314: ""One or Two Dutch" and "Extra Roles" Variant Setups"

• Lūdzu nokopē/ielīmē kļūdas ziņu, ko redzi ekrānā, ja tāda ir.
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Lūdzu paskaidro, ko Tu vēlējies darīt, ko Tu izdarīji un kas notika
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Mozilla v5

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Mozilla v5

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Mozilla v5

• Kas tika attēlots ekrānā, kad Tu tiki bloķēts (tukšs ekrāns? Daļa no spēles interfeisa? Ziņa par kļūdu?)?
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Mozilla v5

• Kura noteikumu daļa netika ņemta vērā BGA versijā?
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Vai noteikumu pārkāpums ir redzams spēles atkārtojumā? Ja jā, tad kurā gājienā?
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Mozilla v5

• Kādu spēles darbību Tu vēlējies veikt?
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Ko tu dari, lai panāktu šo spēles darbību?
• Kas notika, kad veicāt šo darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Mozilla v5

• Kurā spēles solī problēma parādījās (kas bija tā brīža spēles instrukcija)?
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Kas notika, kad mēģinājāt veikt spēles darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Mozilla v5

• Lūdzu aprakstiet radušos problēmu. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Mozilla v5

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Mozilla v5

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Mozilla v5

Kāds ir šis ziņojums?

Kas notika? Lūdzu izvēlies no zemākredzamajiem

Kas notika? Lūdzu izvēlies no zemākredzamajiem

Lūdzu, pārbaudiet, vai par šo pašu tēmu jau ir ziņojums

Detalizēts apraksts

Ziņojuma vēsture

Pievieno kaut ko šim ziņojumam

Mainīt pārskata statusu par:

Palīdzība

Dod ieguldījumu

Sekojiet mums