Visas atskaites
#74988: "A better tutorial feedback system"
Kāds ir šis ziņojums?
BGA mājas lapa
Kas notika? Lūdzu izvēlies no zemākredzamajiem
Ierosinājums: pēc manām domām sekojošie ieteikumi būtiski uzlabotu tīmekļa vietni
Detalizēts apraksts
• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.
Game gurus can currently review tutorials in the ALPHA phase (without us having ANY access to their feedback) and only the public can review tutorials in the BETA phase and beyond. Generally the gurus know the game best so it would be good to either:
- Have access to their feedback by having access to their webpage (I've seen the page before)
- Let early testers leave feedback at the end of the tutorial, so tutorial makers can improve their tutorial.
Today I've only had access to what gurus are saying about the tutorial I made recently, but only through a direct message. It would be good to not need to message directly if possible, so comment threads can involve multiple people reviewing.• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Mozilla v5
Ziņojuma vēsture
2022 1. nov. 21:21 • 3p1cFr3nzy • Šo ieteikumu izstrādātāji vēl nav analizējuši:
For tutorials, they only get promoted to BETA from the ALPHA stage (which is when the public can see them) after they have been reviewed by multiple people, usually around 10 or so. This can be an exception if the developer gets involved and likes the tutorial. Thus, early feedback is vital for the success of a tutorial.
Here is an example of some feedback I could not see from a guru:
snipboard.io/gXdLqK.jpg
This inability to see feedback from gurus spans across all games, and one can only see their comments if they are a guru themselves. To be honest, being a guru in multiple games just for tutorial making is not worth it at all.
The other suggestion would be similar to reviews you normally find online - someone gives a rating together with a comment. Of course, I would suggest complete anonymity for ratings.
Here is an example of some feedback I could not see from a guru:
snipboard.io/gXdLqK.jpg
This inability to see feedback from gurus spans across all games, and one can only see their comments if they are a guru themselves. To be honest, being a guru in multiple games just for tutorial making is not worth it at all.
The other suggestion would be similar to reviews you normally find online - someone gives a rating together with a comment. Of course, I would suggest complete anonymity for ratings.
2023 12. apr. 22:33 • nicotacotac • Šo ieteikumu izstrādātāji vēl nav analizējuši:
Also, being able to add extra comment to the rating (like for alpha and beta *games* - not tutorial) would be greatly valuable
2024 1. jan. 19:06 • lefalaf • Šo ieteikumu izstrādātāji vēl nav analizējuši:
I second the ability to comment, optionally, alongside the start rating at the end. There have been plenty of times when I wanted to say something, but didn't feel like bugging the creator directly, assuming I remembered their handle by the end. I feel it would be good to allow the comments, but leave them in a bucket separate from normal DMs that the creator can review at once for a tutorial / tutorials.
2025 22. mar. 11:44 • Thomas • Šo ieteikumu izstrādātāji vēl nav analizējuši:
I second this. Giving feedback to single steps would help identify the texts. Allowing feedback to have a status (open, rejected, infoneeded, accepted, fixed, reopened) similar to the bug system even allows to see how good a tutorial is.
Pievieno kaut ko šim ziņojumam
Lūdzu, pievienojiet šeit visu, kas šķiet svarīgs, lai reproducētu šo kļūdu vai saprastu jūsu ieteikumu:
- Cita galda ID / gājiena ID
- Vai F5 atrisināja šo problēmu?
- Vai šī problēma parādās vairākas reizes? Katru reizi? Nekonkrētās reizēs?
- Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
