Visas atskaites
Saint Petersburg ziņojumi
#47769: "no need to be sorted when cards flip."
inforequest: Izstrādātāji vēlētos saņemt vairāk informācijas par šo ieteikumu
Kāds ir šis ziņojums?
Kas notika? Lūdzu izvēlies no zemākredzamajiem
Ieteikums: man šķiet, turpmākais ievērojami uzlabotu spēles implementāciju
Detalizēts apraksts
• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.
when cards appear, cards are sorted.
but, I want to know who caused to flip 18 aristocrat on aristocrat phase.
I suggest not to be sorted when cards flip.• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v92
Ziņojuma vēsture
2021 4. sep. 12:06 • Faceman255 • Šo ieteikumu izstrādātāji vēl nav analizējuši:
It makes the game more interesting.
2021 4. sep. 18:38 • Inaofr • Izstrādātāji vēlētos saņemt vairāk informācijas par šo ieteikumu:
So you want drawn cards to be placed on the board in the order they were drawn?
If yes I think most players would dislike it, in my view it is easier to evaluate your next move then cards are sorted. I do not really understand what more you would know if the cards were not sorted.
If yes I think most players would dislike it, in my view it is easier to evaluate your next move then cards are sorted. I do not really understand what more you would know if the cards were not sorted.
2021 14. sep. 15:29 • debjwillis • Izstrādātāji vēlētos saņemt vairāk informācijas par šo ieteikumu:
I agree. I often wonder what the order is of the cards that come up in the next phase so I can better determine the effects of previous actions. Perhaps there's a way to first show the order that the cards came up in when beginning the new phase, and then provide a button where the player could autosort the cards by value when they are ready to do so?
2021 27. sep. 10:13 • Faceman255 • Izstrādātāji vēlētos saņemt vairāk informācijas par šo ieteikumu:
Yes, I think cards should be placed on the board in the order they were drawn.
2022 1. jūn. 4:07 • Faceman255 • Izstrādātāji vēlētos saņemt vairāk informācijas par šo ieteikumu:
In this game, mistress on the 1st round is very important.
In my opinion, arist 4th starter should not flip 4th arist.
If flipped cards are placed on the board in the order, we can know who caused to flip mistress.
On the other situation, we sometimes take the meaningless card to flip more UG cards.
If flipped cards are placed on the board in the order, we can know whether the playing worked.
If flipped cards are placed on the board in the order, the game becomes more interesting.
If real play, we can know it.
In my opinion, arist 4th starter should not flip 4th arist.
If flipped cards are placed on the board in the order, we can know who caused to flip mistress.
On the other situation, we sometimes take the meaningless card to flip more UG cards.
If flipped cards are placed on the board in the order, we can know whether the playing worked.
If flipped cards are placed on the board in the order, the game becomes more interesting.
If real play, we can know it.
2022 1. jūn. 4:15 • Faceman255 • Izstrādātāji vēlētos saņemt vairāk informācijas par šo ieteikumu:
the reason why take meaningless card to flip more UG cards, to flip UG arist.
it sometimes happens at the last round.
it sometimes happens at the last round.
2022 1. jūn. 4:34 • Faceman255 • Izstrādātāji vēlētos saņemt vairāk informācijas par šo ieteikumu:
it is a problem that we can't know the information that we can know at the real game.
2024 7. jūn. 13:57 • bananasplay • Izstrādātāji vēlētos saņemt vairāk informācijas par šo ieteikumu:
As debjwillis writes, one benefit of knowing the order of cards drawn is to ascertain the effects of previous actions. If one, for example, purchases or reserves a card in a given phase, one more card is drawn in the next phase—/which/ card, however, remains a mystery in the current implementation because the cards are automatically sorted. But if the cards were instead shown in the order drawn, the "extra" card would be obvious.
I've upvoted this suggestion, but I think that it should be implemented as a player's preference, with the default setting corresponding to the way the game currently operates, so as to provide no disruption to all players who are used to the current functionality.
Alternatively, if the log were to indicate which cards are drawn—one card per log entry in the order drawn—I think that that would be an acceptable alternative to implementing a player's preference.
I've upvoted this suggestion, but I think that it should be implemented as a player's preference, with the default setting corresponding to the way the game currently operates, so as to provide no disruption to all players who are used to the current functionality.
Alternatively, if the log were to indicate which cards are drawn—one card per log entry in the order drawn—I think that that would be an acceptable alternative to implementing a player's preference.
2024 14. jūn. 18:43 • TaxMan5x • Izstrādātāji vēlētos saņemt vairāk informācijas par šo ieteikumu:
It's an interesting suggestion, but it reminds me of "chasing the rabbit" in hold em poker. While it's interesting to see if your choice was the correct one, it won't (or shouldn't) change your mind about that prior choice. Beyond self-validation, it doesn't really add anything to the game or your strategy.
Pievieno kaut ko šim ziņojumam
Lūdzu, pievienojiet šeit visu, kas šķiet svarīgs, lai reproducētu šo kļūdu vai saprastu jūsu ieteikumu:
- Cita galda ID / gājiena ID
- Vai F5 atrisināja šo problēmu?
- Vai šī problēma parādās vairākas reizes? Katru reizi? Nekonkrētās reizēs?
- Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
