#29018: "2x Multipliers don´t accumulate"
Kāds ir šis ziņojums?
Kas notika? Lūdzu izvēlies no zemākredzamajiem
Kas notika? Lūdzu izvēlies no zemākredzamajiem
Lūdzu, pārbaudiet, vai jau ir ziņojums par to pašu tēmu
Ja jā, lūdzu, balsojiet par šo ziņojumu. Ziņojumiem ar vislielākajām balsīm tiek dota PRIORITĀTE!
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
Detalizēts apraksts
• Lūdzu nokopē/ielīmē kļūdas ziņu, ko redzi ekrānā, ja tāda ir.
Any 2x multiplier letter (B, J, K or Q) which are already very powerful alone, can be impossible to beat if you get 2 of them together.
My suggestion is a simple option that 2x DO NOT accumulate, meaning there is no 4x or 8x, the max is 2x.
This can be implemented as a pre-game option, something like "2x MAX rule".• Lūdzu paskaidro, ko Tu vēlējies darīt, ko Tu izdarīji un kas notika
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v86
• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
Any 2x multiplier letter (B, J, K or Q) which are already very powerful alone, can be impossible to beat if you get 2 of them together.
My suggestion is a simple option that 2x DO NOT accumulate, meaning there is no 4x or 8x, the max is 2x.
This can be implemented as a pre-game option, something like "2x MAX rule".• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v86
• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.
Any 2x multiplier letter (B, J, K or Q) which are already very powerful alone, can be impossible to beat if you get 2 of them together.
My suggestion is a simple option that 2x DO NOT accumulate, meaning there is no 4x or 8x, the max is 2x.
This can be implemented as a pre-game option, something like "2x MAX rule".• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v86
• Kas tika attēlots ekrānā, kad Tu tiki bloķēts (tukšs ekrāns? Daļa no spēles interfeisa? Ziņa par kļūdu?)?
Any 2x multiplier letter (B, J, K or Q) which are already very powerful alone, can be impossible to beat if you get 2 of them together.
My suggestion is a simple option that 2x DO NOT accumulate, meaning there is no 4x or 8x, the max is 2x.
This can be implemented as a pre-game option, something like "2x MAX rule".• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v86
• Kura noteikumu daļa netika ņemta vērā BGA versijā?
Any 2x multiplier letter (B, J, K or Q) which are already very powerful alone, can be impossible to beat if you get 2 of them together.
My suggestion is a simple option that 2x DO NOT accumulate, meaning there is no 4x or 8x, the max is 2x.
This can be implemented as a pre-game option, something like "2x MAX rule".• Vai noteikumu pārkāpums ir redzams spēles atkārtojumā? Ja jā, tad kurā gājienā?
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v86
• Kādu spēles darbību Tu vēlējies veikt?
Any 2x multiplier letter (B, J, K or Q) which are already very powerful alone, can be impossible to beat if you get 2 of them together.
My suggestion is a simple option that 2x DO NOT accumulate, meaning there is no 4x or 8x, the max is 2x.
This can be implemented as a pre-game option, something like "2x MAX rule".• Ko tu dari, lai panāktu šo spēles darbību?
• Kas notika, kad veicāt šo darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v86
• Kurā spēles solī problēma parādījās (kas bija tā brīža spēles instrukcija)?
Any 2x multiplier letter (B, J, K or Q) which are already very powerful alone, can be impossible to beat if you get 2 of them together.
My suggestion is a simple option that 2x DO NOT accumulate, meaning there is no 4x or 8x, the max is 2x.
This can be implemented as a pre-game option, something like "2x MAX rule".• Kas notika, kad mēģinājāt veikt spēles darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v86
• Lūdzu aprakstiet radušos problēmu. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
Any 2x multiplier letter (B, J, K or Q) which are already very powerful alone, can be impossible to beat if you get 2 of them together.
My suggestion is a simple option that 2x DO NOT accumulate, meaning there is no 4x or 8x, the max is 2x.
This can be implemented as a pre-game option, something like "2x MAX rule".• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v86
• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
Any 2x multiplier letter (B, J, K or Q) which are already very powerful alone, can be impossible to beat if you get 2 of them together.
My suggestion is a simple option that 2x DO NOT accumulate, meaning there is no 4x or 8x, the max is 2x.
This can be implemented as a pre-game option, something like "2x MAX rule".• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v86
• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.
Any 2x multiplier letter (B, J, K or Q) which are already very powerful alone, can be impossible to beat if you get 2 of them together.
My suggestion is a simple option that 2x DO NOT accumulate, meaning there is no 4x or 8x, the max is 2x.
This can be implemented as a pre-game option, something like "2x MAX rule".• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v86
Ziņojuma vēsture
His suggestion is to add a variant in which doublers "add" instead of "multiply". So, two doublers applied to the same word would result in 3x earnings instead of 4x.
I'm happy to implement this variant, since it's endorsed by the game designer. I think the "2x MAX" variant you describe goes a little two far, since it eliminates any benefit of achieving multiple doubler requirements, and thus reduces strategic options.
But I really think 3x the points is still too much.
Check the stats to see how many times a player that gets B and J together loses...
I even considered a "no doubles allowed" pre-game option. That would still be good, IMO.
So, the data I have doesn't indicate that doubler stacking is having a significant effect on win rate. It doesn't disprove it either, of course.
I'm not necessarily ruling out a "2x MAX" variant, but I'd like to start with the designer-approved "doublers add" variant first.
(Since I'm just the developer of this game on BGA, not the game designer, I don't feel comfortable introducing significant rule variants without evidence or approval.)
Pievieno kaut ko šim ziņojumam
- Cita galda ID / gājiena ID
- Vai F5 atrisināja šo problēmu?
- Vai šī problēma parādās vairākas reizes? Katru reizi? Nekonkrētās reizēs?
- Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.