#86908: "Able to go back after playing Assertion card and seeing what Base Conservation Project opponent took"
Kāds ir šis ziņojums?
Kas notika? Lūdzu izvēlies no zemākredzamajiem
Kas notika? Lūdzu izvēlies no zemākredzamajiem
Lūdzu, pārbaudiet, vai par šo pašu tēmu jau ir ziņojums
Ja jā, lūdzu, balsojiet par šo ziņojumu. Ziņojumiem ar vislielākajām balsīm tiek dota PRIORITĀTE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detalizēts apraksts
-
• Lūdzu nokopē/ielīmē kļūdas ziņu, ko redzi ekrānā, ja tāda ir.
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. -
• Lūdzu paskaidro, ko Tu vēlējies darīt, ko Tu izdarīji un kas notika
No, it may not have even been in this game that I took back my Assertion Play
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. -
• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?
No, it may not have even been in this game that I took back my Assertion Play
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. • Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Kas tika attēlots ekrānā, kad Tu tiki bloķēts (tukšs ekrāns? Daļa no spēles interfeisa? Ziņa par kļūdu?)?
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. • Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Kura noteikumu daļa netika ņemta vērā BGA versijā?
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. -
• Vai noteikumu pārkāpums ir redzams spēles atkārtojumā? Ja jā, tad kurā gājienā?
No, it may not have even been in this game that I took back my Assertion Play
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Kādu spēles darbību Tu vēlējies veikt?
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. -
• Ko tu dari, lai panāktu šo spēles darbību?
No, it may not have even been in this game that I took back my Assertion Play
-
• Kas notika, kad veicāt šo darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Kurā spēles solī problēma parādījās (kas bija tā brīža spēles instrukcija)?
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. -
• Kas notika, kad mēģinājāt veikt spēles darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?
No, it may not have even been in this game that I took back my Assertion Play
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Lūdzu aprakstiet radušos problēmu. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. • Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. -
• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?
No, it may not have even been in this game that I took back my Assertion Play
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. • Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v112
Ziņojuma vēsture
The second player to do so should NOT be able to do a take-back if the Conservation Project card is still in the opponent's hand.
I dunno where a discarded base conservation project goes to.
The discard pile? Back to the base conservation projects pile to be potentially drawn again?
My intuition is that it goes into a separate discard pile for Base Conservation Projects.
I feel this way because that's what I do with final scoring cards in a 4 player game, which becomes relevant when both cards with Resistance get played, and resultantly, during the course of the game we need to draw more Final Scoring cards than exist in the deck.
Note that this could result in the top of the discard deck showing a different back in rare cases, and players just need to do a random selection method (such as shuffling) without looking -- the same as pilfering from a hand that contains a base conservation project.
About your main point, it does seem to me that the second player shouldn't get a take-back because they can deduce the taken conservation project. However, it is a very minor edge case:
* Two DIFFERENT players must both get Assertion animals (there are only two of these in the game).
* The second player must play their Assertion animal before the first player plays their project.
* Even if this very rare case happens, in most cases I suspect it is obvious which project the first player wants, e.g. they have 4 Asia icons and the Asia project is not visible.
I think perhaps this bug is not fixed
Pievieno kaut ko šim ziņojumam
- Cita galda ID / gājiena ID
- Vai F5 atrisināja šo problēmu?
- Vai šī problēma parādās vairākas reizes? Katru reizi? Nekonkrētās reizēs?
- Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
