#77525: "Conflict between 2 Monasteries in Might not resolved at the right time - resolved later wrong time"
Kāds ir šis ziņojums?
Kas notika? Lūdzu izvēlies no zemākredzamajiem
Kas notika? Lūdzu izvēlies no zemākredzamajiem
Lūdzu, pārbaudiet, vai par šo pašu tēmu jau ir ziņojums
Ja jā, lūdzu, balsojiet par šo ziņojumu. Ziņojumiem ar vislielākajām balsīm tiek dota PRIORITĀTE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detalizēts apraksts
-
• Lūdzu nokopē/ielīmē kļūdas ziņu, ko redzi ekrānā, ja tāda ir.
The 2 monasteries in the Western domain were breaching the hierarchy rule and were not resolved in the turn that the breach happened. I wasn't involved in the conflict but for some reason during my turn, after I'd played all my cards (none of the moves affected the domain in question, in any epoch) it asked my to choose which of the 2 monasteries, owned by my opponents, to downsize.
-
• Lūdzu paskaidro, ko Tu vēlējies darīt, ko Tu izdarīji un kas notika
See in screenshot
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v108
-
• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
The 2 monasteries in the Western domain were breaching the hierarchy rule and were not resolved in the turn that the breach happened. I wasn't involved in the conflict but for some reason during my turn, after I'd played all my cards (none of the moves affected the domain in question, in any epoch) it asked my to choose which of the 2 monasteries, owned by my opponents, to downsize.
-
• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?
See in screenshot
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v108
-
• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.
The 2 monasteries in the Western domain were breaching the hierarchy rule and were not resolved in the turn that the breach happened. I wasn't involved in the conflict but for some reason during my turn, after I'd played all my cards (none of the moves affected the domain in question, in any epoch) it asked my to choose which of the 2 monasteries, owned by my opponents, to downsize.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v108
-
• Kas tika attēlots ekrānā, kad Tu tiki bloķēts (tukšs ekrāns? Daļa no spēles interfeisa? Ziņa par kļūdu?)?
The 2 monasteries in the Western domain were breaching the hierarchy rule and were not resolved in the turn that the breach happened. I wasn't involved in the conflict but for some reason during my turn, after I'd played all my cards (none of the moves affected the domain in question, in any epoch) it asked my to choose which of the 2 monasteries, owned by my opponents, to downsize.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v108
-
• Kura noteikumu daļa netika ņemta vērā BGA versijā?
The 2 monasteries in the Western domain were breaching the hierarchy rule and were not resolved in the turn that the breach happened. I wasn't involved in the conflict but for some reason during my turn, after I'd played all my cards (none of the moves affected the domain in question, in any epoch) it asked my to choose which of the 2 monasteries, owned by my opponents, to downsize.
-
• Vai noteikumu pārkāpums ir redzams spēles atkārtojumā? Ja jā, tad kurā gājienā?
See in screenshot
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v108
-
• Kādu spēles darbību Tu vēlējies veikt?
The 2 monasteries in the Western domain were breaching the hierarchy rule and were not resolved in the turn that the breach happened. I wasn't involved in the conflict but for some reason during my turn, after I'd played all my cards (none of the moves affected the domain in question, in any epoch) it asked my to choose which of the 2 monasteries, owned by my opponents, to downsize.
-
• Ko tu dari, lai panāktu šo spēles darbību?
See in screenshot
-
• Kas notika, kad veicāt šo darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v108
-
• Kurā spēles solī problēma parādījās (kas bija tā brīža spēles instrukcija)?
The 2 monasteries in the Western domain were breaching the hierarchy rule and were not resolved in the turn that the breach happened. I wasn't involved in the conflict but for some reason during my turn, after I'd played all my cards (none of the moves affected the domain in question, in any epoch) it asked my to choose which of the 2 monasteries, owned by my opponents, to downsize.
-
• Kas notika, kad mēģinājāt veikt spēles darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?
See in screenshot
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v108
-
• Lūdzu aprakstiet radušos problēmu. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
The 2 monasteries in the Western domain were breaching the hierarchy rule and were not resolved in the turn that the breach happened. I wasn't involved in the conflict but for some reason during my turn, after I'd played all my cards (none of the moves affected the domain in question, in any epoch) it asked my to choose which of the 2 monasteries, owned by my opponents, to downsize.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v108
-
• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
The 2 monasteries in the Western domain were breaching the hierarchy rule and were not resolved in the turn that the breach happened. I wasn't involved in the conflict but for some reason during my turn, after I'd played all my cards (none of the moves affected the domain in question, in any epoch) it asked my to choose which of the 2 monasteries, owned by my opponents, to downsize.
-
• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?
See in screenshot
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v108
-
• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.
The 2 monasteries in the Western domain were breaching the hierarchy rule and were not resolved in the turn that the breach happened. I wasn't involved in the conflict but for some reason during my turn, after I'd played all my cards (none of the moves affected the domain in question, in any epoch) it asked my to choose which of the 2 monasteries, owned by my opponents, to downsize.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v108
Ziņojuma vēsture
Your bug has probably been fixed already, or was linked to a temporary failure of BGA service.
In any case, when filling a bug report, make sure to have an explicit title linked to the incident (ex: with error message), so other players can recognize it and vote for it.
Pievieno kaut ko šim ziņojumam
- Cita galda ID / gājiena ID
- Vai F5 atrisināja šo problēmu?
- Vai šī problēma parādās vairākas reizes? Katru reizi? Nekonkrētās reizēs?
- Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
