• Lūdzu nokopē/ielīmē kļūdas ziņu, ko redzi ekrānā, ja tāda ir.

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Lūdzu paskaidro, ko Tu vēlējies darīt, ko Tu izdarīji un kas notika

Move 220 & Move 223

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

Move 220 & Move 223

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kas tika attēlots ekrānā, kad Tu tiki bloķēts (tukšs ekrāns? Daļa no spēles interfeisa? Ziņa par kļūdu?)?

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kura noteikumu daļa netika ņemta vērā BGA versijā?

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Vai noteikumu pārkāpums ir redzams spēles atkārtojumā? Ja jā, tad kurā gājienā?

Move 220 & Move 223

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kādu spēles darbību Tu vēlējies veikt?

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Ko tu dari, lai panāktu šo spēles darbību?

Move 220 & Move 223

• Kas notika, kad veicāt šo darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kurā spēles solī problēma parādījās (kas bija tā brīža spēles instrukcija)?

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Kas notika, kad mēģinājāt veikt spēles darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

Move 220 & Move 223

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu aprakstiet radušos problēmu. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

Move 220 & Move 223

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?