#72332: "improved layout for after-game dice statistics (with proposed mock-up)"
Kāds ir šis ziņojums?
Kas notika? Lūdzu izvēlies no zemākredzamajiem
Kas notika? Lūdzu izvēlies no zemākredzamajiem
Lūdzu, pārbaudiet, vai par šo pašu tēmu jau ir ziņojums
Ja jā, lūdzu, balsojiet par šo ziņojumu. Ziņojumiem ar vislielākajām balsīm tiek dota PRIORITĀTE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detalizēts apraksts
-
• Lūdzu nokopē/ielīmē kļūdas ziņu, ko redzi ekrānā, ja tāda ir.
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). -
• Lūdzu paskaidro, ko Tu vēlējies darīt, ko Tu izdarīji un kas notika
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). -
• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). • Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Kas tika attēlots ekrānā, kad Tu tiki bloķēts (tukšs ekrāns? Daļa no spēles interfeisa? Ziņa par kļūdu?)?
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). • Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Kura noteikumu daļa netika ņemta vērā BGA versijā?
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). -
• Vai noteikumu pārkāpums ir redzams spēles atkārtojumā? Ja jā, tad kurā gājienā?
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Kādu spēles darbību Tu vēlējies veikt?
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). -
• Ko tu dari, lai panāktu šo spēles darbību?
-
• Kas notika, kad veicāt šo darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Kurā spēles solī problēma parādījās (kas bija tā brīža spēles instrukcija)?
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). -
• Kas notika, kad mēģinājāt veikt spēles darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Lūdzu aprakstiet radušos problēmu. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). • Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). -
• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). • Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Firefox for Windows
Ziņojuma vēsture
In effect, the omission of the % symbol and the rounding to the nearest percentage point leads people to assume that a game had, perhaps 98 or 101 rolls, rather than 50 or 60 which is typical. Then you can do the math correctly and you find that the probability of no 9's being rolled is about 1 in 100,000, assuming 98 rolls per game. But on BGA, it occurs around once in 400 games (since the true number of rolls per game is usually 50 or 60). This can lead them to believe that the dice algorithm is either buggy or rigged.
Examples:
boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=125351#p125351
boardgamearena.com/bug?id=66082
boardgamearena.com/bug?id=67316
boardgamearena.com/bug?id=70809
Pievieno kaut ko šim ziņojumam
- Cita galda ID / gājiena ID
- Vai F5 atrisināja šo problēmu?
- Vai šī problēma parādās vairākas reizes? Katru reizi? Nekonkrētās reizēs?
- Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
