#69961: "Yield not offered for newly revealed enemy"
Kāds ir šis ziņojums?
Kas notika? Lūdzu izvēlies no zemākredzamajiem
Kas notika? Lūdzu izvēlies no zemākredzamajiem
Lūdzu, pārbaudiet, vai par šo pašu tēmu jau ir ziņojums
Ja jā, lūdzu, balsojiet par šo ziņojumu. Ziņojumiem ar vislielākajām balsīm tiek dota PRIORITĀTE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detalizēts apraksts
-
• Lūdzu nokopē/ielīmē kļūdas ziņu, ko redzi ekrānā, ja tāda ir.
turtler7 yielded against the first jack.
Dsumma defeated that jack. So a turn was taken and a card was played.
The new jack she wanted to yield and discard 10 since she didn't have a diamond to play.
But the game refused to let her yield since on his last turn turtler had yielded.
I believe the rulebook says if all players had yielded on their last turn.
An earlier version of the rules and the intention of the rules is that there cannot be consecutive yields equal to the player count. Since it wasn't consecutive (a card was played and a new enemy is out), it should allow a yield action against a newly revealed opponent. -
• Lūdzu paskaidro, ko Tu vēlējies darīt, ko Tu izdarīji un kas notika
7
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v104
-
• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
turtler7 yielded against the first jack.
Dsumma defeated that jack. So a turn was taken and a card was played.
The new jack she wanted to yield and discard 10 since she didn't have a diamond to play.
But the game refused to let her yield since on his last turn turtler had yielded.
I believe the rulebook says if all players had yielded on their last turn.
An earlier version of the rules and the intention of the rules is that there cannot be consecutive yields equal to the player count. Since it wasn't consecutive (a card was played and a new enemy is out), it should allow a yield action against a newly revealed opponent. -
• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?
7
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v104
-
• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.
turtler7 yielded against the first jack.
Dsumma defeated that jack. So a turn was taken and a card was played.
The new jack she wanted to yield and discard 10 since she didn't have a diamond to play.
But the game refused to let her yield since on his last turn turtler had yielded.
I believe the rulebook says if all players had yielded on their last turn.
An earlier version of the rules and the intention of the rules is that there cannot be consecutive yields equal to the player count. Since it wasn't consecutive (a card was played and a new enemy is out), it should allow a yield action against a newly revealed opponent. • Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v104
-
• Kas tika attēlots ekrānā, kad Tu tiki bloķēts (tukšs ekrāns? Daļa no spēles interfeisa? Ziņa par kļūdu?)?
turtler7 yielded against the first jack.
Dsumma defeated that jack. So a turn was taken and a card was played.
The new jack she wanted to yield and discard 10 since she didn't have a diamond to play.
But the game refused to let her yield since on his last turn turtler had yielded.
I believe the rulebook says if all players had yielded on their last turn.
An earlier version of the rules and the intention of the rules is that there cannot be consecutive yields equal to the player count. Since it wasn't consecutive (a card was played and a new enemy is out), it should allow a yield action against a newly revealed opponent. • Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v104
-
• Kura noteikumu daļa netika ņemta vērā BGA versijā?
turtler7 yielded against the first jack.
Dsumma defeated that jack. So a turn was taken and a card was played.
The new jack she wanted to yield and discard 10 since she didn't have a diamond to play.
But the game refused to let her yield since on his last turn turtler had yielded.
I believe the rulebook says if all players had yielded on their last turn.
An earlier version of the rules and the intention of the rules is that there cannot be consecutive yields equal to the player count. Since it wasn't consecutive (a card was played and a new enemy is out), it should allow a yield action against a newly revealed opponent. -
• Vai noteikumu pārkāpums ir redzams spēles atkārtojumā? Ja jā, tad kurā gājienā?
7
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v104
-
• Kādu spēles darbību Tu vēlējies veikt?
turtler7 yielded against the first jack.
Dsumma defeated that jack. So a turn was taken and a card was played.
The new jack she wanted to yield and discard 10 since she didn't have a diamond to play.
But the game refused to let her yield since on his last turn turtler had yielded.
I believe the rulebook says if all players had yielded on their last turn.
An earlier version of the rules and the intention of the rules is that there cannot be consecutive yields equal to the player count. Since it wasn't consecutive (a card was played and a new enemy is out), it should allow a yield action against a newly revealed opponent. -
• Ko tu dari, lai panāktu šo spēles darbību?
7
-
• Kas notika, kad veicāt šo darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v104
-
• Kurā spēles solī problēma parādījās (kas bija tā brīža spēles instrukcija)?
turtler7 yielded against the first jack.
Dsumma defeated that jack. So a turn was taken and a card was played.
The new jack she wanted to yield and discard 10 since she didn't have a diamond to play.
But the game refused to let her yield since on his last turn turtler had yielded.
I believe the rulebook says if all players had yielded on their last turn.
An earlier version of the rules and the intention of the rules is that there cannot be consecutive yields equal to the player count. Since it wasn't consecutive (a card was played and a new enemy is out), it should allow a yield action against a newly revealed opponent. -
• Kas notika, kad mēģinājāt veikt spēles darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?
7
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v104
-
• Lūdzu aprakstiet radušos problēmu. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
turtler7 yielded against the first jack.
Dsumma defeated that jack. So a turn was taken and a card was played.
The new jack she wanted to yield and discard 10 since she didn't have a diamond to play.
But the game refused to let her yield since on his last turn turtler had yielded.
I believe the rulebook says if all players had yielded on their last turn.
An earlier version of the rules and the intention of the rules is that there cannot be consecutive yields equal to the player count. Since it wasn't consecutive (a card was played and a new enemy is out), it should allow a yield action against a newly revealed opponent. • Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v104
-
• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
turtler7 yielded against the first jack.
Dsumma defeated that jack. So a turn was taken and a card was played.
The new jack she wanted to yield and discard 10 since she didn't have a diamond to play.
But the game refused to let her yield since on his last turn turtler had yielded.
I believe the rulebook says if all players had yielded on their last turn.
An earlier version of the rules and the intention of the rules is that there cannot be consecutive yields equal to the player count. Since it wasn't consecutive (a card was played and a new enemy is out), it should allow a yield action against a newly revealed opponent. -
• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?
7
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v104
-
• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.
turtler7 yielded against the first jack.
Dsumma defeated that jack. So a turn was taken and a card was played.
The new jack she wanted to yield and discard 10 since she didn't have a diamond to play.
But the game refused to let her yield since on his last turn turtler had yielded.
I believe the rulebook says if all players had yielded on their last turn.
An earlier version of the rules and the intention of the rules is that there cannot be consecutive yields equal to the player count. Since it wasn't consecutive (a card was played and a new enemy is out), it should allow a yield action against a newly revealed opponent. • Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v104
Ziņojuma vēsture
Pievieno kaut ko šim ziņojumam
- Cita galda ID / gājiena ID
- Vai F5 atrisināja šo problēmu?
- Vai šī problēma parādās vairākas reizes? Katru reizi? Nekonkrētās reizēs?
- Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
