• Lūdzu nokopē/ielīmē kļūdas ziņu, ko redzi ekrānā, ja tāda ir.

I'm not sure if this could be categorized under "rules", since bidding isn't in the official rulebook, so I'm posting this as a suggestion:

I don't think a player should be allowed to spend excessive VPs (i.e. more than necessary to win) when bidding for the last "open" starting position. Since there are no more bidding actions once each player has chosen a different position, the last person to bid would essentially just give away points to the other player(s) if not bidding the minimum amount.

I just made the mistake of bidding 4 VP instead of 0 for 1st in one of my own games, not realizing the other two players had already bid for 2nd and 3rd. In this case it was an honest mistake, but I could see it potentially being abused.

(And just to clarify: I'm only talking about the very final bid before the game starts. You would still be able to bid any amount while there are other players still bidding.)

• Lūdzu paskaidro, ko Tu vēlējies darīt, ko Tu izdarīji un kas notika

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

I'm not sure if this could be categorized under "rules", since bidding isn't in the official rulebook, so I'm posting this as a suggestion:

I don't think a player should be allowed to spend excessive VPs (i.e. more than necessary to win) when bidding for the last "open" starting position. Since there are no more bidding actions once each player has chosen a different position, the last person to bid would essentially just give away points to the other player(s) if not bidding the minimum amount.

I just made the mistake of bidding 4 VP instead of 0 for 1st in one of my own games, not realizing the other two players had already bid for 2nd and 3rd. In this case it was an honest mistake, but I could see it potentially being abused.

(And just to clarify: I'm only talking about the very final bid before the game starts. You would still be able to bid any amount while there are other players still bidding.)

• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

I'm not sure if this could be categorized under "rules", since bidding isn't in the official rulebook, so I'm posting this as a suggestion:

I don't think a player should be allowed to spend excessive VPs (i.e. more than necessary to win) when bidding for the last "open" starting position. Since there are no more bidding actions once each player has chosen a different position, the last person to bid would essentially just give away points to the other player(s) if not bidding the minimum amount.

I just made the mistake of bidding 4 VP instead of 0 for 1st in one of my own games, not realizing the other two players had already bid for 2nd and 3rd. In this case it was an honest mistake, but I could see it potentially being abused.

(And just to clarify: I'm only talking about the very final bid before the game starts. You would still be able to bid any amount while there are other players still bidding.)

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kas tika attēlots ekrānā, kad Tu tiki bloķēts (tukšs ekrāns? Daļa no spēles interfeisa? Ziņa par kļūdu?)?

I'm not sure if this could be categorized under "rules", since bidding isn't in the official rulebook, so I'm posting this as a suggestion:

I don't think a player should be allowed to spend excessive VPs (i.e. more than necessary to win) when bidding for the last "open" starting position. Since there are no more bidding actions once each player has chosen a different position, the last person to bid would essentially just give away points to the other player(s) if not bidding the minimum amount.

I just made the mistake of bidding 4 VP instead of 0 for 1st in one of my own games, not realizing the other two players had already bid for 2nd and 3rd. In this case it was an honest mistake, but I could see it potentially being abused.

(And just to clarify: I'm only talking about the very final bid before the game starts. You would still be able to bid any amount while there are other players still bidding.)

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kura noteikumu daļa netika ņemta vērā BGA versijā?

I'm not sure if this could be categorized under "rules", since bidding isn't in the official rulebook, so I'm posting this as a suggestion:

I don't think a player should be allowed to spend excessive VPs (i.e. more than necessary to win) when bidding for the last "open" starting position. Since there are no more bidding actions once each player has chosen a different position, the last person to bid would essentially just give away points to the other player(s) if not bidding the minimum amount.

I just made the mistake of bidding 4 VP instead of 0 for 1st in one of my own games, not realizing the other two players had already bid for 2nd and 3rd. In this case it was an honest mistake, but I could see it potentially being abused.

(And just to clarify: I'm only talking about the very final bid before the game starts. You would still be able to bid any amount while there are other players still bidding.)

• Vai noteikumu pārkāpums ir redzams spēles atkārtojumā? Ja jā, tad kurā gājienā?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kādu spēles darbību Tu vēlējies veikt?

I'm not sure if this could be categorized under "rules", since bidding isn't in the official rulebook, so I'm posting this as a suggestion:

I don't think a player should be allowed to spend excessive VPs (i.e. more than necessary to win) when bidding for the last "open" starting position. Since there are no more bidding actions once each player has chosen a different position, the last person to bid would essentially just give away points to the other player(s) if not bidding the minimum amount.

I just made the mistake of bidding 4 VP instead of 0 for 1st in one of my own games, not realizing the other two players had already bid for 2nd and 3rd. In this case it was an honest mistake, but I could see it potentially being abused.

(And just to clarify: I'm only talking about the very final bid before the game starts. You would still be able to bid any amount while there are other players still bidding.)

• Ko tu dari, lai panāktu šo spēles darbību?

• Kas notika, kad veicāt šo darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kurā spēles solī problēma parādījās (kas bija tā brīža spēles instrukcija)?

I'm not sure if this could be categorized under "rules", since bidding isn't in the official rulebook, so I'm posting this as a suggestion:

I don't think a player should be allowed to spend excessive VPs (i.e. more than necessary to win) when bidding for the last "open" starting position. Since there are no more bidding actions once each player has chosen a different position, the last person to bid would essentially just give away points to the other player(s) if not bidding the minimum amount.

I just made the mistake of bidding 4 VP instead of 0 for 1st in one of my own games, not realizing the other two players had already bid for 2nd and 3rd. In this case it was an honest mistake, but I could see it potentially being abused.

(And just to clarify: I'm only talking about the very final bid before the game starts. You would still be able to bid any amount while there are other players still bidding.)

• Kas notika, kad mēģinājāt veikt spēles darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu aprakstiet radušos problēmu. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

I'm not sure if this could be categorized under "rules", since bidding isn't in the official rulebook, so I'm posting this as a suggestion:

I don't think a player should be allowed to spend excessive VPs (i.e. more than necessary to win) when bidding for the last "open" starting position. Since there are no more bidding actions once each player has chosen a different position, the last person to bid would essentially just give away points to the other player(s) if not bidding the minimum amount.

I just made the mistake of bidding 4 VP instead of 0 for 1st in one of my own games, not realizing the other two players had already bid for 2nd and 3rd. In this case it was an honest mistake, but I could see it potentially being abused.

(And just to clarify: I'm only talking about the very final bid before the game starts. You would still be able to bid any amount while there are other players still bidding.)

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

I'm not sure if this could be categorized under "rules", since bidding isn't in the official rulebook, so I'm posting this as a suggestion:

I don't think a player should be allowed to spend excessive VPs (i.e. more than necessary to win) when bidding for the last "open" starting position. Since there are no more bidding actions once each player has chosen a different position, the last person to bid would essentially just give away points to the other player(s) if not bidding the minimum amount.

I just made the mistake of bidding 4 VP instead of 0 for 1st in one of my own games, not realizing the other two players had already bid for 2nd and 3rd. In this case it was an honest mistake, but I could see it potentially being abused.

(And just to clarify: I'm only talking about the very final bid before the game starts. You would still be able to bid any amount while there are other players still bidding.)

• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

I'm not sure if this could be categorized under "rules", since bidding isn't in the official rulebook, so I'm posting this as a suggestion:

I don't think a player should be allowed to spend excessive VPs (i.e. more than necessary to win) when bidding for the last "open" starting position. Since there are no more bidding actions once each player has chosen a different position, the last person to bid would essentially just give away points to the other player(s) if not bidding the minimum amount.

I just made the mistake of bidding 4 VP instead of 0 for 1st in one of my own games, not realizing the other two players had already bid for 2nd and 3rd. In this case it was an honest mistake, but I could see it potentially being abused.

(And just to clarify: I'm only talking about the very final bid before the game starts. You would still be able to bid any amount while there are other players still bidding.)

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?