• Lūdzu nokopē/ielīmē kļūdas ziņu, ko redzi ekrānā, ja tāda ir.

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Lūdzu paskaidro, ko Tu vēlējies darīt, ko Tu izdarīji un kas notika

the described situation occurs between moves 155 and 163 Table #286876848

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kas tika attēlots ekrānā, kad Tu tiki bloķēts (tukšs ekrāns? Daļa no spēles interfeisa? Ziņa par kļūdu?)?

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kura noteikumu daļa netika ņemta vērā BGA versijā?

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Vai noteikumu pārkāpums ir redzams spēles atkārtojumā? Ja jā, tad kurā gājienā?

the described situation occurs between moves 155 and 163 Table #286876848

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kādu spēles darbību Tu vēlējies veikt?

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Ko tu dari, lai panāktu šo spēles darbību?

the described situation occurs between moves 155 and 163 Table #286876848

• Kas notika, kad veicāt šo darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kurā spēles solī problēma parādījās (kas bija tā brīža spēles instrukcija)?

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Kas notika, kad mēģinājāt veikt spēles darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

the described situation occurs between moves 155 and 163 Table #286876848

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu aprakstiet radušos problēmu. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?