Visas atskaites
Space Base ziņojumi
#63467: "Random Number generator"
rejected: Izstrādātāji uzskata, ka tā nav pietiekami laba ideja vai ka izmaksu/ieguvumu attiecība tās gadījumā ir pārāk augsta
6
Kāds ir šis ziņojums?
Kas notika? Lūdzu izvēlies no zemākredzamajiem
Ieteikums: man šķiet, turpmākais ievērojami uzlabotu spēles implementāciju
Detalizēts apraksts
• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.
The random number generator for this game does not seem to work properly. If you roll 2d6 (two normal dice), the probabilities for each number are weighted most toward the middle numbers, six(13.89%), seven (16.67%), and eight (13.89%). This means that 44.45% of the time, the dice should equal one of those three numbers. After more than 80 plays of this game, I can tell you that there is no way those percentages are holding up. What appears to be happening is an even chance (9.09%) of rolling each number from 2 through 12, rather than the proper spread we should be seeing. The end result is an overwhelming amount of rolls away from what should be the most commonly rolled numbers.• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v100
Ziņojuma vēsture
2022 25. apr. 4:10 • Talon378 • Šo ieteikumu izstrādātāji vēl nav analizējuši:
This is occurring in every game I play of this game. The lack of compliance to what should be the proper probabilities for the spread of rolls means that the strategy of the game is altered and becomes MUCH more random.
2022 6. mai. 7:05 • Rick_M • Šo ieteikumu izstrādātāji vēl nav analizējuši:
I also sense that the dice rolls are not random. We just played 4 games and (1)(2) roll was much too frequent. I remember the first time I played and rolled 4 elevens in a row to start the game. I'd run some stats on the dice, but capturing the data from a game would be much too tedious.
Also, we had the same 4 players and selected replay option. The game displays message saying that player order is randomized, but we were in same order each game.
Also, we had the same 4 players and selected replay option. The game displays message saying that player order is randomized, but we were in same order each game.
2022 9. mai. 2:01 • Talon378 • Šo ieteikumu izstrādātāji vēl nav analizējuši:
Table #265890439
I had purchased sectors and set my board up to give me victory points any time I rolled a 7 or above. I rolled victory points once, and has to spend a cube to move to victory points a second time. It is ridiculous that in 50+ turns I could not roll a 7 or above. Fix your dice roller!
I had purchased sectors and set my board up to give me victory points any time I rolled a 7 or above. I rolled victory points once, and has to spend a cube to move to victory points a second time. It is ridiculous that in 50+ turns I could not roll a 7 or above. Fix your dice roller!
2022 21. jūn. 20:06 • Biking Gamer • Šo ieteikumu izstrādātāji vēl nav analizējuši:
I concur - the dice rolls on this game (and others) does not appear random. I recommend using the milliseconds on clock time as a seed for your random number generator -- that should produce more random results.
2023 10. feb. 16:29 • Andrew C-137 • Šo ieteikumu izstrādātāji vēl nav analizējuši:
@ Rick_M
A simple solution for tracking dice throws is already there. All that needs to change with the stats at the end is to breakout a second column so that you can see the occurrences of single die results, then the second column shows "Two-Die" results. Right now having them combined is meaningless, but to see those separately, along with a total column at the end, will give you easily scrapeable data. One game of course won't be enough (anyone who's played roulette and seen a run of 50 reds knows what I'm talking about), and you'll have to extrapolate for 1's and 12 over 2 and 6's, but seeing that data over dozens of games might help people see if it's truly close to random.
A simple solution for tracking dice throws is already there. All that needs to change with the stats at the end is to breakout a second column so that you can see the occurrences of single die results, then the second column shows "Two-Die" results. Right now having them combined is meaningless, but to see those separately, along with a total column at the end, will give you easily scrapeable data. One game of course won't be enough (anyone who's played roulette and seen a run of 50 reds knows what I'm talking about), and you'll have to extrapolate for 1's and 12 over 2 and 6's, but seeing that data over dozens of games might help people see if it's truly close to random.
2023 12. feb. 16:18 • Shazzypaz • Izstrādātāji uzskata, ka tā nav pietiekami laba ideja vai ka izmaksu/ieguvumu attiecība tās gadījumā ir pārāk augsta:
Developers are instructed to use the bga_rand() function, no flexibility to use another function. If you are concerned about the randomness, please upvote boardgamearena.com/bug?id=72077.
2023 7. apr. 1:40 • Antstad • Izstrādātāji uzskata, ka tā nav pietiekami laba ideja vai ka izmaksu/ieguvumu attiecība tās gadījumā ir pārāk augsta:
Just upvoted. I sware it's getting worse on the site.
Pievieno kaut ko šim ziņojumam
Lūdzu, pievienojiet šeit visu, kas šķiet svarīgs, lai reproducētu šo kļūdu vai saprastu jūsu ieteikumu:
- Cita galda ID / gājiena ID
- Vai F5 atrisināja šo problēmu?
- Vai šī problēma parādās vairākas reizes? Katru reizi? Nekonkrētās reizēs?
- Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
