#61829: "Scoring Error, missing destination should be considered before missing station"
Kāds ir šis ziņojums?
Kas notika? Lūdzu izvēlies no zemākredzamajiem
Kas notika? Lūdzu izvēlies no zemākredzamajiem
Lūdzu, pārbaudiet, vai par šo pašu tēmu jau ir ziņojums
Ja jā, lūdzu, balsojiet par šo ziņojumu. Ziņojumiem ar vislielākajām balsīm tiek dota PRIORITĀTE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detalizēts apraksts
-
• Lūdzu nokopē/ielīmē kļūdas ziņu, ko redzi ekrānā, ja tāda ir.
missing destination should be considered before missing station.
Red didn't place his E destination at all.
Orange place his E destination, but no station.
In this case, Red should be responsible for the incomplete route, and get -6 points (or orange & blue get +6 points in BGA adaptation).
However, the game thinks both Red & Orange are responsible, and have both Red & Orange have -6 points (only blue gets +6 points).
This does not follow the rules.
-
• Lūdzu paskaidro, ko Tu vēlējies darīt, ko Tu izdarīji un kas notika
Yes, in final scoring.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
missing destination should be considered before missing station.
Red didn't place his E destination at all.
Orange place his E destination, but no station.
In this case, Red should be responsible for the incomplete route, and get -6 points (or orange & blue get +6 points in BGA adaptation).
However, the game thinks both Red & Orange are responsible, and have both Red & Orange have -6 points (only blue gets +6 points).
This does not follow the rules.
-
• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?
Yes, in final scoring.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.
missing destination should be considered before missing station.
Red didn't place his E destination at all.
Orange place his E destination, but no station.
In this case, Red should be responsible for the incomplete route, and get -6 points (or orange & blue get +6 points in BGA adaptation).
However, the game thinks both Red & Orange are responsible, and have both Red & Orange have -6 points (only blue gets +6 points).
This does not follow the rules.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Kas tika attēlots ekrānā, kad Tu tiki bloķēts (tukšs ekrāns? Daļa no spēles interfeisa? Ziņa par kļūdu?)?
missing destination should be considered before missing station.
Red didn't place his E destination at all.
Orange place his E destination, but no station.
In this case, Red should be responsible for the incomplete route, and get -6 points (or orange & blue get +6 points in BGA adaptation).
However, the game thinks both Red & Orange are responsible, and have both Red & Orange have -6 points (only blue gets +6 points).
This does not follow the rules.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Kura noteikumu daļa netika ņemta vērā BGA versijā?
missing destination should be considered before missing station.
Red didn't place his E destination at all.
Orange place his E destination, but no station.
In this case, Red should be responsible for the incomplete route, and get -6 points (or orange & blue get +6 points in BGA adaptation).
However, the game thinks both Red & Orange are responsible, and have both Red & Orange have -6 points (only blue gets +6 points).
This does not follow the rules.
-
• Vai noteikumu pārkāpums ir redzams spēles atkārtojumā? Ja jā, tad kurā gājienā?
Yes, in final scoring.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Kādu spēles darbību Tu vēlējies veikt?
missing destination should be considered before missing station.
Red didn't place his E destination at all.
Orange place his E destination, but no station.
In this case, Red should be responsible for the incomplete route, and get -6 points (or orange & blue get +6 points in BGA adaptation).
However, the game thinks both Red & Orange are responsible, and have both Red & Orange have -6 points (only blue gets +6 points).
This does not follow the rules.
-
• Ko tu dari, lai panāktu šo spēles darbību?
Yes, in final scoring.
-
• Kas notika, kad veicāt šo darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Kurā spēles solī problēma parādījās (kas bija tā brīža spēles instrukcija)?
missing destination should be considered before missing station.
Red didn't place his E destination at all.
Orange place his E destination, but no station.
In this case, Red should be responsible for the incomplete route, and get -6 points (or orange & blue get +6 points in BGA adaptation).
However, the game thinks both Red & Orange are responsible, and have both Red & Orange have -6 points (only blue gets +6 points).
This does not follow the rules.
-
• Kas notika, kad mēģinājāt veikt spēles darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?
Yes, in final scoring.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Lūdzu aprakstiet radušos problēmu. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
missing destination should be considered before missing station.
Red didn't place his E destination at all.
Orange place his E destination, but no station.
In this case, Red should be responsible for the incomplete route, and get -6 points (or orange & blue get +6 points in BGA adaptation).
However, the game thinks both Red & Orange are responsible, and have both Red & Orange have -6 points (only blue gets +6 points).
This does not follow the rules.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
missing destination should be considered before missing station.
Red didn't place his E destination at all.
Orange place his E destination, but no station.
In this case, Red should be responsible for the incomplete route, and get -6 points (or orange & blue get +6 points in BGA adaptation).
However, the game thinks both Red & Orange are responsible, and have both Red & Orange have -6 points (only blue gets +6 points).
This does not follow the rules.
-
• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?
Yes, in final scoring.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v99
-
• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.
missing destination should be considered before missing station.
Red didn't place his E destination at all.
Orange place his E destination, but no station.
In this case, Red should be responsible for the incomplete route, and get -6 points (or orange & blue get +6 points in BGA adaptation).
However, the game thinks both Red & Orange are responsible, and have both Red & Orange have -6 points (only blue gets +6 points).
This does not follow the rules.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v99
Ziņojuma vēsture
imgur.com/a/cSbIhNU
The blue player should not score anything, but scoring 6 points is equivalent to removing 6 points from each of the other players. I suppose this is a peculiarity of the implementation of Metromania on BGA.
As your report does not concern this peculiarity, but claims that the orange player should score 6 points, I would say that not only is it contrary to the rule, but on the form you do not even quote the rule point that you claim to apply, and it makes you wonder if you’ve read the rule.
Not a bug.
Quote from rule book:
"- If the destination marker was never placed on the board,
the guilty party is the player who didn't place the marker.
- If the marker was placed but nobody put a station touching
it, the guilty party is the player who placed the destination.
- If the markers were both placed, but no route exists
between the two, both players who placed the markers
are guilty."
Note the first rule, "the guilty party is the player who didn't place the marker".
This should take precedent over the second rule, but in the BGA implementation, it doesn't.
This is a bug / wrong implementation of the rule.
Your bug has probably been fixed already, or was linked to a temporary failure of BGA service.
In any case, when filling a bug report, make sure to have an explicit title linked to the incident (ex: with error message), so other players can recognize it and vote for it.
Pievieno kaut ko šim ziņojumam
- Cita galda ID / gājiena ID
- Vai F5 atrisināja šo problēmu?
- Vai šī problēma parādās vairākas reizes? Katru reizi? Nekonkrētās reizēs?
- Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
