• Lūdzu nokopē/ielīmē kļūdas ziņu, ko redzi ekrānā, ja tāda ir.

Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436

Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.

1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).

2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.

From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."

Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?

3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.

Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community.

• Lūdzu paskaidro, ko Tu vēlējies darīt, ko Tu izdarīji un kas notika

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436

Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.

1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).

2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.

From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."

Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?

3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.

Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436

Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.

1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).

2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.

From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."

Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?

3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.

Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kas tika attēlots ekrānā, kad Tu tiki bloķēts (tukšs ekrāns? Daļa no spēles interfeisa? Ziņa par kļūdu?)?

Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436

Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.

1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).

2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.

From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."

Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?

3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.

Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kura noteikumu daļa netika ņemta vērā BGA versijā?

Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436

Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.

1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).

2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.

From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."

Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?

3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.

Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community.

• Vai noteikumu pārkāpums ir redzams spēles atkārtojumā? Ja jā, tad kurā gājienā?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kādu spēles darbību Tu vēlējies veikt?

Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436

Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.

1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).

2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.

From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."

Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?

3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.

Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community.

• Ko tu dari, lai panāktu šo spēles darbību?

• Kas notika, kad veicāt šo darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kurā spēles solī problēma parādījās (kas bija tā brīža spēles instrukcija)?

Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436

Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.

1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).

2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.

From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."

Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?

3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.

Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community.

• Kas notika, kad mēģinājāt veikt spēles darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu aprakstiet radušos problēmu. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436

Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.

1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).

2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.

From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."

Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?

3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.

Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436

Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.

1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).

2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.

From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."

Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?

3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.

Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436

Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.

1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).

2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.

From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."

Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?

3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.

Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?