#56881: "Improvements in the English strings of the game"
Kāds ir šis ziņojums?
Kas notika? Lūdzu izvēlies no zemākredzamajiem
Kas notika? Lūdzu izvēlies no zemākredzamajiem
Lūdzu, pārbaudiet, vai par šo pašu tēmu jau ir ziņojums
Ja jā, lūdzu, balsojiet par šo ziņojumu. Ziņojumiem ar vislielākajām balsīm tiek dota PRIORITĀTE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detalizēts apraksts
-
• Lūdzu nokopē/ielīmē kļūdas ziņu, ko redzi ekrānā, ja tāda ir.
I noticed a few improvements that could be made to Klaverjassen's English strings and most of them are explained below (and I'm motivated to implement them if you agree):
For example it shouldn't be the same word when choosing the length of the game "16 rounds ? 8 rounds ?" than when we have two consecutive moments to choose the trump suit for a 'round'. But there are 'statistics' telling the "Number of takes in second round" (=No. This could be the second turn inside the current (2nd or 7th or 16th) round) or "You cannot choose the same Trump as the trump card passed in the first round"
In addition to that, some other words are used, like "Number of hands won" or "Number of hands with all tricks (Mars)" or "Player for this hand" or "Result of this hand" -> in theses cases "hand" means "round" or vice-versa
Or "Number of failed plays (Nat)" = same concept
So, before suggesting English-text modifications, I'd like to have your opinion.
* Should we speak of a game with 8 or 16 HANDS, and a hand is divided into "2 ROUNDS (where we can choose the trump suit) and then a playing-cards moment" (<< These two words HAND + ROUND are those used in Belote and Coinche)
OR
* Should we speak of a game with 8 or 16 ROUNDS, and a round is divided into "2 TURNS (where we can choose the trump suit) and then a playing-cards moment"
OR
* something else :)
See you -
• Lūdzu paskaidro, ko Tu vēlējies darīt, ko Tu izdarīji un kas notika
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v97
-
• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
I noticed a few improvements that could be made to Klaverjassen's English strings and most of them are explained below (and I'm motivated to implement them if you agree):
For example it shouldn't be the same word when choosing the length of the game "16 rounds ? 8 rounds ?" than when we have two consecutive moments to choose the trump suit for a 'round'. But there are 'statistics' telling the "Number of takes in second round" (=No. This could be the second turn inside the current (2nd or 7th or 16th) round) or "You cannot choose the same Trump as the trump card passed in the first round"
In addition to that, some other words are used, like "Number of hands won" or "Number of hands with all tricks (Mars)" or "Player for this hand" or "Result of this hand" -> in theses cases "hand" means "round" or vice-versa
Or "Number of failed plays (Nat)" = same concept
So, before suggesting English-text modifications, I'd like to have your opinion.
* Should we speak of a game with 8 or 16 HANDS, and a hand is divided into "2 ROUNDS (where we can choose the trump suit) and then a playing-cards moment" (<< These two words HAND + ROUND are those used in Belote and Coinche)
OR
* Should we speak of a game with 8 or 16 ROUNDS, and a round is divided into "2 TURNS (where we can choose the trump suit) and then a playing-cards moment"
OR
* something else :)
See you -
• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v97
-
• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.
I noticed a few improvements that could be made to Klaverjassen's English strings and most of them are explained below (and I'm motivated to implement them if you agree):
For example it shouldn't be the same word when choosing the length of the game "16 rounds ? 8 rounds ?" than when we have two consecutive moments to choose the trump suit for a 'round'. But there are 'statistics' telling the "Number of takes in second round" (=No. This could be the second turn inside the current (2nd or 7th or 16th) round) or "You cannot choose the same Trump as the trump card passed in the first round"
In addition to that, some other words are used, like "Number of hands won" or "Number of hands with all tricks (Mars)" or "Player for this hand" or "Result of this hand" -> in theses cases "hand" means "round" or vice-versa
Or "Number of failed plays (Nat)" = same concept
So, before suggesting English-text modifications, I'd like to have your opinion.
* Should we speak of a game with 8 or 16 HANDS, and a hand is divided into "2 ROUNDS (where we can choose the trump suit) and then a playing-cards moment" (<< These two words HAND + ROUND are those used in Belote and Coinche)
OR
* Should we speak of a game with 8 or 16 ROUNDS, and a round is divided into "2 TURNS (where we can choose the trump suit) and then a playing-cards moment"
OR
* something else :)
See you • Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v97
-
• Kas tika attēlots ekrānā, kad Tu tiki bloķēts (tukšs ekrāns? Daļa no spēles interfeisa? Ziņa par kļūdu?)?
I noticed a few improvements that could be made to Klaverjassen's English strings and most of them are explained below (and I'm motivated to implement them if you agree):
For example it shouldn't be the same word when choosing the length of the game "16 rounds ? 8 rounds ?" than when we have two consecutive moments to choose the trump suit for a 'round'. But there are 'statistics' telling the "Number of takes in second round" (=No. This could be the second turn inside the current (2nd or 7th or 16th) round) or "You cannot choose the same Trump as the trump card passed in the first round"
In addition to that, some other words are used, like "Number of hands won" or "Number of hands with all tricks (Mars)" or "Player for this hand" or "Result of this hand" -> in theses cases "hand" means "round" or vice-versa
Or "Number of failed plays (Nat)" = same concept
So, before suggesting English-text modifications, I'd like to have your opinion.
* Should we speak of a game with 8 or 16 HANDS, and a hand is divided into "2 ROUNDS (where we can choose the trump suit) and then a playing-cards moment" (<< These two words HAND + ROUND are those used in Belote and Coinche)
OR
* Should we speak of a game with 8 or 16 ROUNDS, and a round is divided into "2 TURNS (where we can choose the trump suit) and then a playing-cards moment"
OR
* something else :)
See you • Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v97
-
• Kura noteikumu daļa netika ņemta vērā BGA versijā?
I noticed a few improvements that could be made to Klaverjassen's English strings and most of them are explained below (and I'm motivated to implement them if you agree):
For example it shouldn't be the same word when choosing the length of the game "16 rounds ? 8 rounds ?" than when we have two consecutive moments to choose the trump suit for a 'round'. But there are 'statistics' telling the "Number of takes in second round" (=No. This could be the second turn inside the current (2nd or 7th or 16th) round) or "You cannot choose the same Trump as the trump card passed in the first round"
In addition to that, some other words are used, like "Number of hands won" or "Number of hands with all tricks (Mars)" or "Player for this hand" or "Result of this hand" -> in theses cases "hand" means "round" or vice-versa
Or "Number of failed plays (Nat)" = same concept
So, before suggesting English-text modifications, I'd like to have your opinion.
* Should we speak of a game with 8 or 16 HANDS, and a hand is divided into "2 ROUNDS (where we can choose the trump suit) and then a playing-cards moment" (<< These two words HAND + ROUND are those used in Belote and Coinche)
OR
* Should we speak of a game with 8 or 16 ROUNDS, and a round is divided into "2 TURNS (where we can choose the trump suit) and then a playing-cards moment"
OR
* something else :)
See you -
• Vai noteikumu pārkāpums ir redzams spēles atkārtojumā? Ja jā, tad kurā gājienā?
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v97
-
• Kādu spēles darbību Tu vēlējies veikt?
I noticed a few improvements that could be made to Klaverjassen's English strings and most of them are explained below (and I'm motivated to implement them if you agree):
For example it shouldn't be the same word when choosing the length of the game "16 rounds ? 8 rounds ?" than when we have two consecutive moments to choose the trump suit for a 'round'. But there are 'statistics' telling the "Number of takes in second round" (=No. This could be the second turn inside the current (2nd or 7th or 16th) round) or "You cannot choose the same Trump as the trump card passed in the first round"
In addition to that, some other words are used, like "Number of hands won" or "Number of hands with all tricks (Mars)" or "Player for this hand" or "Result of this hand" -> in theses cases "hand" means "round" or vice-versa
Or "Number of failed plays (Nat)" = same concept
So, before suggesting English-text modifications, I'd like to have your opinion.
* Should we speak of a game with 8 or 16 HANDS, and a hand is divided into "2 ROUNDS (where we can choose the trump suit) and then a playing-cards moment" (<< These two words HAND + ROUND are those used in Belote and Coinche)
OR
* Should we speak of a game with 8 or 16 ROUNDS, and a round is divided into "2 TURNS (where we can choose the trump suit) and then a playing-cards moment"
OR
* something else :)
See you -
• Ko tu dari, lai panāktu šo spēles darbību?
-
• Kas notika, kad veicāt šo darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v97
-
• Kurā spēles solī problēma parādījās (kas bija tā brīža spēles instrukcija)?
I noticed a few improvements that could be made to Klaverjassen's English strings and most of them are explained below (and I'm motivated to implement them if you agree):
For example it shouldn't be the same word when choosing the length of the game "16 rounds ? 8 rounds ?" than when we have two consecutive moments to choose the trump suit for a 'round'. But there are 'statistics' telling the "Number of takes in second round" (=No. This could be the second turn inside the current (2nd or 7th or 16th) round) or "You cannot choose the same Trump as the trump card passed in the first round"
In addition to that, some other words are used, like "Number of hands won" or "Number of hands with all tricks (Mars)" or "Player for this hand" or "Result of this hand" -> in theses cases "hand" means "round" or vice-versa
Or "Number of failed plays (Nat)" = same concept
So, before suggesting English-text modifications, I'd like to have your opinion.
* Should we speak of a game with 8 or 16 HANDS, and a hand is divided into "2 ROUNDS (where we can choose the trump suit) and then a playing-cards moment" (<< These two words HAND + ROUND are those used in Belote and Coinche)
OR
* Should we speak of a game with 8 or 16 ROUNDS, and a round is divided into "2 TURNS (where we can choose the trump suit) and then a playing-cards moment"
OR
* something else :)
See you -
• Kas notika, kad mēģinājāt veikt spēles darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v97
-
• Lūdzu aprakstiet radušos problēmu. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
I noticed a few improvements that could be made to Klaverjassen's English strings and most of them are explained below (and I'm motivated to implement them if you agree):
For example it shouldn't be the same word when choosing the length of the game "16 rounds ? 8 rounds ?" than when we have two consecutive moments to choose the trump suit for a 'round'. But there are 'statistics' telling the "Number of takes in second round" (=No. This could be the second turn inside the current (2nd or 7th or 16th) round) or "You cannot choose the same Trump as the trump card passed in the first round"
In addition to that, some other words are used, like "Number of hands won" or "Number of hands with all tricks (Mars)" or "Player for this hand" or "Result of this hand" -> in theses cases "hand" means "round" or vice-versa
Or "Number of failed plays (Nat)" = same concept
So, before suggesting English-text modifications, I'd like to have your opinion.
* Should we speak of a game with 8 or 16 HANDS, and a hand is divided into "2 ROUNDS (where we can choose the trump suit) and then a playing-cards moment" (<< These two words HAND + ROUND are those used in Belote and Coinche)
OR
* Should we speak of a game with 8 or 16 ROUNDS, and a round is divided into "2 TURNS (where we can choose the trump suit) and then a playing-cards moment"
OR
* something else :)
See you • Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v97
-
• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
I noticed a few improvements that could be made to Klaverjassen's English strings and most of them are explained below (and I'm motivated to implement them if you agree):
For example it shouldn't be the same word when choosing the length of the game "16 rounds ? 8 rounds ?" than when we have two consecutive moments to choose the trump suit for a 'round'. But there are 'statistics' telling the "Number of takes in second round" (=No. This could be the second turn inside the current (2nd or 7th or 16th) round) or "You cannot choose the same Trump as the trump card passed in the first round"
In addition to that, some other words are used, like "Number of hands won" or "Number of hands with all tricks (Mars)" or "Player for this hand" or "Result of this hand" -> in theses cases "hand" means "round" or vice-versa
Or "Number of failed plays (Nat)" = same concept
So, before suggesting English-text modifications, I'd like to have your opinion.
* Should we speak of a game with 8 or 16 HANDS, and a hand is divided into "2 ROUNDS (where we can choose the trump suit) and then a playing-cards moment" (<< These two words HAND + ROUND are those used in Belote and Coinche)
OR
* Should we speak of a game with 8 or 16 ROUNDS, and a round is divided into "2 TURNS (where we can choose the trump suit) and then a playing-cards moment"
OR
* something else :)
See you -
• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v97
-
• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.
I noticed a few improvements that could be made to Klaverjassen's English strings and most of them are explained below (and I'm motivated to implement them if you agree):
For example it shouldn't be the same word when choosing the length of the game "16 rounds ? 8 rounds ?" than when we have two consecutive moments to choose the trump suit for a 'round'. But there are 'statistics' telling the "Number of takes in second round" (=No. This could be the second turn inside the current (2nd or 7th or 16th) round) or "You cannot choose the same Trump as the trump card passed in the first round"
In addition to that, some other words are used, like "Number of hands won" or "Number of hands with all tricks (Mars)" or "Player for this hand" or "Result of this hand" -> in theses cases "hand" means "round" or vice-versa
Or "Number of failed plays (Nat)" = same concept
So, before suggesting English-text modifications, I'd like to have your opinion.
* Should we speak of a game with 8 or 16 HANDS, and a hand is divided into "2 ROUNDS (where we can choose the trump suit) and then a playing-cards moment" (<< These two words HAND + ROUND are those used in Belote and Coinche)
OR
* Should we speak of a game with 8 or 16 ROUNDS, and a round is divided into "2 TURNS (where we can choose the trump suit) and then a playing-cards moment"
OR
* something else :)
See you • Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v97
Ziņojuma vēsture
normally translations are just handled by the community, but of course for English strings it is special because all games must be developed in English first.
So if there are really errors, it would be best to fix them in the source.
As Klaverjassen is a Dutch game, this gave some challenges because there just is no fixed English terminology - if you check the wikipedia and pagat rules, you will see they also use "hand" or "round" for the same concept. And for game specific concepts like "Nat" or "Mars" there really is just nothing translatable ("Nat" would actually mean "wet" in English)
I understand your suggestion, but since the game has been released over 1,5 years now, I am reluctant to change anything in the source string - as that would mean all long validated translations have to be redone again.
But if you want to make some improvements in consistency using the English-to-English translations, that's fine by me.
I believe it would be best to keep the term HAND for a full play of all dealt cards and team scoring.
For the Trump selection phase, I really don't have a preference or any argument for one or the other term.
If you say Hand/Round are the terms used in both Belote and Coinche, it makes sense to keep them aligned as they are all card games from the same family.
Thanks and keep enjoying Klaverjassen!
Pievieno kaut ko šim ziņojumam
- Cita galda ID / gājiena ID
- Vai F5 atrisināja šo problēmu?
- Vai šī problēma parādās vairākas reizes? Katru reizi? Nekonkrētās reizēs?
- Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
