#42737: "Stale games rule should take into account the number of cards"
Kāds ir šis ziņojums?
Kas notika? Lūdzu izvēlies no zemākredzamajiem
Kas notika? Lūdzu izvēlies no zemākredzamajiem
Lūdzu, pārbaudiet, vai par šo pašu tēmu jau ir ziņojums
Ja jā, lūdzu, balsojiet par šo ziņojumu. Ziņojumiem ar vislielākajām balsīm tiek dota PRIORITĀTE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detalizēts apraksts
-
• Lūdzu nokopē/ielīmē kļūdas ziņu, ko redzi ekrānā, ja tāda ir.
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
-
• Lūdzu paskaidro, ko Tu vēlējies darīt, ko Tu izdarīji un kas notika
Turns 302 and 319 are identical except that my opponent had one card less. He had to use it to get out of position 302. If he had had another identical card, he would have been able to reproduce the same escape, but I would not have been able to go back to that position because of the current stale game rule.
RQ: It was not the case and therefore the game result would not have been different with a correct rule taking into account the players cards • Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
-
• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?
Turns 302 and 319 are identical except that my opponent had one card less. He had to use it to get out of position 302. If he had had another identical card, he would have been able to reproduce the same escape, but I would not have been able to go back to that position because of the current stale game rule.
RQ: It was not the case and therefore the game result would not have been different with a correct rule taking into account the players cards • Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Kas tika attēlots ekrānā, kad Tu tiki bloķēts (tukšs ekrāns? Daļa no spēles interfeisa? Ziņa par kļūdu?)?
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Kura noteikumu daļa netika ņemta vērā BGA versijā?
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
-
• Vai noteikumu pārkāpums ir redzams spēles atkārtojumā? Ja jā, tad kurā gājienā?
Turns 302 and 319 are identical except that my opponent had one card less. He had to use it to get out of position 302. If he had had another identical card, he would have been able to reproduce the same escape, but I would not have been able to go back to that position because of the current stale game rule.
RQ: It was not the case and therefore the game result would not have been different with a correct rule taking into account the players cards • Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Kādu spēles darbību Tu vēlējies veikt?
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
-
• Ko tu dari, lai panāktu šo spēles darbību?
Turns 302 and 319 are identical except that my opponent had one card less. He had to use it to get out of position 302. If he had had another identical card, he would have been able to reproduce the same escape, but I would not have been able to go back to that position because of the current stale game rule.
RQ: It was not the case and therefore the game result would not have been different with a correct rule taking into account the players cards -
• Kas notika, kad veicāt šo darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Kurā spēles solī problēma parādījās (kas bija tā brīža spēles instrukcija)?
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
-
• Kas notika, kad mēģinājāt veikt spēles darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?
Turns 302 and 319 are identical except that my opponent had one card less. He had to use it to get out of position 302. If he had had another identical card, he would have been able to reproduce the same escape, but I would not have been able to go back to that position because of the current stale game rule.
RQ: It was not the case and therefore the game result would not have been different with a correct rule taking into account the players cards • Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Lūdzu aprakstiet radušos problēmu. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
-
• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?
Turns 302 and 319 are identical except that my opponent had one card less. He had to use it to get out of position 302. If he had had another identical card, he would have been able to reproduce the same escape, but I would not have been able to go back to that position because of the current stale game rule.
RQ: It was not the case and therefore the game result would not have been different with a correct rule taking into account the players cards • Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v91
Ziņojuma vēsture
I don't remember exactly the full reasons, but I remember discussing it with Quentin when we designed the feature.
The rule was designed to force the currently winning player to not block the game by repeating the same moves endlessly while the loosing player try to protect their position.
The winning player interest is to give up on the attack to avoid the draw. While the loosing player can be interested in blocking to get a draw instead of a loss.
Pievieno kaut ko šim ziņojumam
- Cita galda ID / gājiena ID
- Vai F5 atrisināja šo problēmu?
- Vai šī problēma parādās vairākas reizes? Katru reizi? Nekonkrētās reizēs?
- Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
