• Lūdzu nokopē/ielīmē kļūdas ziņu, ko redzi ekrānā, ja tāda ir.

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Lūdzu paskaidro, ko Tu vēlējies darīt, ko Tu izdarīji un kas notika

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kas tika attēlots ekrānā, kad Tu tiki bloķēts (tukšs ekrāns? Daļa no spēles interfeisa? Ziņa par kļūdu?)?

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kura noteikumu daļa netika ņemta vērā BGA versijā?

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Vai noteikumu pārkāpums ir redzams spēles atkārtojumā? Ja jā, tad kurā gājienā?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kādu spēles darbību Tu vēlējies veikt?

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Ko tu dari, lai panāktu šo spēles darbību?

• Kas notika, kad veicāt šo darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kurā spēles solī problēma parādījās (kas bija tā brīža spēles instrukcija)?

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Kas notika, kad mēģinājāt veikt spēles darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu aprakstiet radušos problēmu. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?