• Lūdzu nokopē/ielīmē kļūdas ziņu, ko redzi ekrānā, ja tāda ir.

Since there is no benefit to not take the action of the spy (Steal 1 money), whenever possible the spy should just work automatically:

a.) When there is only a single card next to the spy, the action should execute automatically.
b.) If there are two cards next to the spy but one is from the own family, it doesn't make sense to ask the player to confirm.

• Lūdzu paskaidro, ko Tu vēlējies darīt, ko Tu izdarīji un kas notika

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

Since there is no benefit to not take the action of the spy (Steal 1 money), whenever possible the spy should just work automatically:

a.) When there is only a single card next to the spy, the action should execute automatically.
b.) If there are two cards next to the spy but one is from the own family, it doesn't make sense to ask the player to confirm.

• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

Since there is no benefit to not take the action of the spy (Steal 1 money), whenever possible the spy should just work automatically:

a.) When there is only a single card next to the spy, the action should execute automatically.
b.) If there are two cards next to the spy but one is from the own family, it doesn't make sense to ask the player to confirm.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kas tika attēlots ekrānā, kad Tu tiki bloķēts (tukšs ekrāns? Daļa no spēles interfeisa? Ziņa par kļūdu?)?

Since there is no benefit to not take the action of the spy (Steal 1 money), whenever possible the spy should just work automatically:

a.) When there is only a single card next to the spy, the action should execute automatically.
b.) If there are two cards next to the spy but one is from the own family, it doesn't make sense to ask the player to confirm.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kura noteikumu daļa netika ņemta vērā BGA versijā?

Since there is no benefit to not take the action of the spy (Steal 1 money), whenever possible the spy should just work automatically:

a.) When there is only a single card next to the spy, the action should execute automatically.
b.) If there are two cards next to the spy but one is from the own family, it doesn't make sense to ask the player to confirm.

• Vai noteikumu pārkāpums ir redzams spēles atkārtojumā? Ja jā, tad kurā gājienā?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kādu spēles darbību Tu vēlējies veikt?

Since there is no benefit to not take the action of the spy (Steal 1 money), whenever possible the spy should just work automatically:

a.) When there is only a single card next to the spy, the action should execute automatically.
b.) If there are two cards next to the spy but one is from the own family, it doesn't make sense to ask the player to confirm.

• Ko tu dari, lai panāktu šo spēles darbību?

• Kas notika, kad veicāt šo darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kurā spēles solī problēma parādījās (kas bija tā brīža spēles instrukcija)?

Since there is no benefit to not take the action of the spy (Steal 1 money), whenever possible the spy should just work automatically:

a.) When there is only a single card next to the spy, the action should execute automatically.
b.) If there are two cards next to the spy but one is from the own family, it doesn't make sense to ask the player to confirm.

• Kas notika, kad mēģinājāt veikt spēles darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu aprakstiet radušos problēmu. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

Since there is no benefit to not take the action of the spy (Steal 1 money), whenever possible the spy should just work automatically:

a.) When there is only a single card next to the spy, the action should execute automatically.
b.) If there are two cards next to the spy but one is from the own family, it doesn't make sense to ask the player to confirm.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

Since there is no benefit to not take the action of the spy (Steal 1 money), whenever possible the spy should just work automatically:

a.) When there is only a single card next to the spy, the action should execute automatically.
b.) If there are two cards next to the spy but one is from the own family, it doesn't make sense to ask the player to confirm.

• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

Since there is no benefit to not take the action of the spy (Steal 1 money), whenever possible the spy should just work automatically:

a.) When there is only a single card next to the spy, the action should execute automatically.
b.) If there are two cards next to the spy but one is from the own family, it doesn't make sense to ask the player to confirm.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?