• Lūdzu nokopē/ielīmē kļūdas ziņu, ko redzi ekrānā, ja tāda ir.

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• Lūdzu paskaidro, ko Tu vēlējies darīt, ko Tu izdarīji un kas notika

Per the rules in the book the distress signal should a group choice. However, per the BGA implementation any person can press the distress signal without anyone else having a say in this.
Then once activated, the Captain is given the choice on direction, without input from the group.
This clearly violates the concept of "decide together" which indicates a group choice.

Instead, a better method would be to have a button which players could use to indicate their desire to use the distress signal, that would then be codified by a majority rule, with captain being tie-breaker.

The same concept would be used for deciding the direction, by allowing each player a single vote for Right or Left, or no pass or no preference option, with ties being decided by the Captain.

Alternatively allowing an undo if the group decides they do not want to use to distress signal.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

Per the rules in the book the distress signal should a group choice. However, per the BGA implementation any person can press the distress signal without anyone else having a say in this.
Then once activated, the Captain is given the choice on direction, without input from the group.
This clearly violates the concept of "decide together" which indicates a group choice.

Instead, a better method would be to have a button which players could use to indicate their desire to use the distress signal, that would then be codified by a majority rule, with captain being tie-breaker.

The same concept would be used for deciding the direction, by allowing each player a single vote for Right or Left, or no pass or no preference option, with ties being decided by the Captain.

Alternatively allowing an undo if the group decides they do not want to use to distress signal.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kas tika attēlots ekrānā, kad Tu tiki bloķēts (tukšs ekrāns? Daļa no spēles interfeisa? Ziņa par kļūdu?)?

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kura noteikumu daļa netika ņemta vērā BGA versijā?

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• Vai noteikumu pārkāpums ir redzams spēles atkārtojumā? Ja jā, tad kurā gājienā?

Per the rules in the book the distress signal should a group choice. However, per the BGA implementation any person can press the distress signal without anyone else having a say in this.
Then once activated, the Captain is given the choice on direction, without input from the group.
This clearly violates the concept of "decide together" which indicates a group choice.

Instead, a better method would be to have a button which players could use to indicate their desire to use the distress signal, that would then be codified by a majority rule, with captain being tie-breaker.

The same concept would be used for deciding the direction, by allowing each player a single vote for Right or Left, or no pass or no preference option, with ties being decided by the Captain.

Alternatively allowing an undo if the group decides they do not want to use to distress signal.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kādu spēles darbību Tu vēlējies veikt?

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• Ko tu dari, lai panāktu šo spēles darbību?

Per the rules in the book the distress signal should a group choice. However, per the BGA implementation any person can press the distress signal without anyone else having a say in this.
Then once activated, the Captain is given the choice on direction, without input from the group.
This clearly violates the concept of "decide together" which indicates a group choice.

Instead, a better method would be to have a button which players could use to indicate their desire to use the distress signal, that would then be codified by a majority rule, with captain being tie-breaker.

The same concept would be used for deciding the direction, by allowing each player a single vote for Right or Left, or no pass or no preference option, with ties being decided by the Captain.

Alternatively allowing an undo if the group decides they do not want to use to distress signal.

• Kas notika, kad veicāt šo darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kurā spēles solī problēma parādījās (kas bija tā brīža spēles instrukcija)?

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• Kas notika, kad mēģinājāt veikt spēles darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

Per the rules in the book the distress signal should a group choice. However, per the BGA implementation any person can press the distress signal without anyone else having a say in this.
Then once activated, the Captain is given the choice on direction, without input from the group.
This clearly violates the concept of "decide together" which indicates a group choice.

Instead, a better method would be to have a button which players could use to indicate their desire to use the distress signal, that would then be codified by a majority rule, with captain being tie-breaker.

The same concept would be used for deciding the direction, by allowing each player a single vote for Right or Left, or no pass or no preference option, with ties being decided by the Captain.

Alternatively allowing an undo if the group decides they do not want to use to distress signal.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu aprakstiet radušos problēmu. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

Per the rules in the book the distress signal should a group choice. However, per the BGA implementation any person can press the distress signal without anyone else having a say in this.
Then once activated, the Captain is given the choice on direction, without input from the group.
This clearly violates the concept of "decide together" which indicates a group choice.

Instead, a better method would be to have a button which players could use to indicate their desire to use the distress signal, that would then be codified by a majority rule, with captain being tie-breaker.

The same concept would be used for deciding the direction, by allowing each player a single vote for Right or Left, or no pass or no preference option, with ties being decided by the Captain.

Alternatively allowing an undo if the group decides they do not want to use to distress signal.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?