#20752: "Cue bid should not be possible unless you hold the card that would be called"
Kāds ir šis ziņojums?
Kas notika? Lūdzu izvēlies no zemākredzamajiem
Kas notika? Lūdzu izvēlies no zemākredzamajiem
Lūdzu, pārbaudiet, vai par šo pašu tēmu jau ir ziņojums
Ja jā, lūdzu, balsojiet par šo ziņojumu. Ziņojumiem ar vislielākajām balsīm tiek dota PRIORITĀTE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detalizēts apraksts
-
• Lūdzu nokopē/ielīmē kļūdas ziņu, ko redzi ekrānā, ja tāda ir.
At move 256, a player made an inadvertent cue bid, inviting the 18 to be called. No one overbid, and he got the bid. But he said he did not have the card he had (accidentally) invited to be called. We thought a player was required to have the card they were inviting another bidder to call.
-
• Lūdzu paskaidro, ko Tu vēlējies darīt, ko Tu izdarīji un kas notika
Check the hands at move 256 and see whether the player who made the cue bid actually had the 18.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Firefox Quantum 67.0
-
• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
At move 256, a player made an inadvertent cue bid, inviting the 18 to be called. No one overbid, and he got the bid. But he said he did not have the card he had (accidentally) invited to be called. We thought a player was required to have the card they were inviting another bidder to call.
-
• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?
Check the hands at move 256 and see whether the player who made the cue bid actually had the 18.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Firefox Quantum 67.0
-
• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.
At move 256, a player made an inadvertent cue bid, inviting the 18 to be called. No one overbid, and he got the bid. But he said he did not have the card he had (accidentally) invited to be called. We thought a player was required to have the card they were inviting another bidder to call.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Firefox Quantum 67.0
-
• Kas tika attēlots ekrānā, kad Tu tiki bloķēts (tukšs ekrāns? Daļa no spēles interfeisa? Ziņa par kļūdu?)?
At move 256, a player made an inadvertent cue bid, inviting the 18 to be called. No one overbid, and he got the bid. But he said he did not have the card he had (accidentally) invited to be called. We thought a player was required to have the card they were inviting another bidder to call.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Firefox Quantum 67.0
-
• Kura noteikumu daļa netika ņemta vērā BGA versijā?
At move 256, a player made an inadvertent cue bid, inviting the 18 to be called. No one overbid, and he got the bid. But he said he did not have the card he had (accidentally) invited to be called. We thought a player was required to have the card they were inviting another bidder to call.
-
• Vai noteikumu pārkāpums ir redzams spēles atkārtojumā? Ja jā, tad kurā gājienā?
Check the hands at move 256 and see whether the player who made the cue bid actually had the 18.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Firefox Quantum 67.0
-
• Kādu spēles darbību Tu vēlējies veikt?
At move 256, a player made an inadvertent cue bid, inviting the 18 to be called. No one overbid, and he got the bid. But he said he did not have the card he had (accidentally) invited to be called. We thought a player was required to have the card they were inviting another bidder to call.
-
• Ko tu dari, lai panāktu šo spēles darbību?
Check the hands at move 256 and see whether the player who made the cue bid actually had the 18.
-
• Kas notika, kad veicāt šo darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Firefox Quantum 67.0
-
• Kurā spēles solī problēma parādījās (kas bija tā brīža spēles instrukcija)?
At move 256, a player made an inadvertent cue bid, inviting the 18 to be called. No one overbid, and he got the bid. But he said he did not have the card he had (accidentally) invited to be called. We thought a player was required to have the card they were inviting another bidder to call.
-
• Kas notika, kad mēģinājāt veikt spēles darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?
Check the hands at move 256 and see whether the player who made the cue bid actually had the 18.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Firefox Quantum 67.0
-
• Lūdzu aprakstiet radušos problēmu. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
At move 256, a player made an inadvertent cue bid, inviting the 18 to be called. No one overbid, and he got the bid. But he said he did not have the card he had (accidentally) invited to be called. We thought a player was required to have the card they were inviting another bidder to call.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Firefox Quantum 67.0
-
• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
At move 256, a player made an inadvertent cue bid, inviting the 18 to be called. No one overbid, and he got the bid. But he said he did not have the card he had (accidentally) invited to be called. We thought a player was required to have the card they were inviting another bidder to call.
-
• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?
Check the hands at move 256 and see whether the player who made the cue bid actually had the 18.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Firefox Quantum 67.0
-
• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.
At move 256, a player made an inadvertent cue bid, inviting the 18 to be called. No one overbid, and he got the bid. But he said he did not have the card he had (accidentally) invited to be called. We thought a player was required to have the card they were inviting another bidder to call.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Firefox Quantum 67.0
Ziņojuma vēsture
(a) as first bidder you can bid whatever you like, but if someone else accepts the presumed invitation, you must bid on to indicate that it wasn't actually an invitation
(b) if you don't hold the required card for an invitation, you must bid 3, but nobody else bids, you are then allowed to take fewer than 3 if you wish
(c) if you don't hold the required card for an invitation, you must bid 3, and if nobody else bids you must take 3
The last variant is somewhat marginal, the other two are widespread. My implementation uses (a) on the basis that in (b) we make life easier for the player with a strong hand. Force them to make a decision instead: "do I want to risk getting too many trumps, discarding some, and then winning a game of little value OR getting even fewer cards than I'd like and possibly struggling in a higher value game?"
BTW there are (quite wordy) tooltips provided for bidding button explaining what exactly each bid means. If a bid isn't legal then its button won't show up - anything you do see is legal to say. Admitedly the tooltips won't help you if you're using a touchscreen.
(Also, if you're doing very little cue-bidding, you're doing the right thing. That's meant for strong hands where the two high honours have a good chance of winning a game of one or solo with at least trull, even against the pagat and the XX. Under 6 trumps you shouldn't even consider a cue bid, but I'm not sure I've done it more than once or twice even with 6.)
Pievieno kaut ko šim ziņojumam
- Cita galda ID / gājiena ID
- Vai F5 atrisināja šo problēmu?
- Vai šī problēma parādās vairākas reizes? Katru reizi? Nekonkrētās reizēs?
- Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
