#163615: "Third dominance check. UI shows tie but points awarded as if no tie"
Kāds ir šis ziņojums?
Kas notika? Lūdzu izvēlies no zemākredzamajiem
Kas notika? Lūdzu izvēlies no zemākredzamajiem
Lūdzu, pārbaudiet, vai par šo pašu tēmu jau ir ziņojums
Ja jā, lūdzu, balsojiet par šo ziņojumu. Ziņojumiem ar vislielākajām balsīm tiek dota PRIORITĀTE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detalizēts apraksts
-
• Lūdzu nokopē/ielīmē kļūdas ziņu, ko redzi ekrānā, ja tāda ir.
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. -
• Lūdzu paskaidro, ko Tu vēlējies darīt, ko Tu izdarīji un kas notika
Yes. The last move since it ended the game by runaway score.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Mozilla v5
-
• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. -
• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?
Yes. The last move since it ended the game by runaway score.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Mozilla v5
-
• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. • Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Mozilla v5
-
• Kas tika attēlots ekrānā, kad Tu tiki bloķēts (tukšs ekrāns? Daļa no spēles interfeisa? Ziņa par kļūdu?)?
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. • Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Mozilla v5
-
• Kura noteikumu daļa netika ņemta vērā BGA versijā?
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. -
• Vai noteikumu pārkāpums ir redzams spēles atkārtojumā? Ja jā, tad kurā gājienā?
Yes. The last move since it ended the game by runaway score.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Mozilla v5
-
• Kādu spēles darbību Tu vēlējies veikt?
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. -
• Ko tu dari, lai panāktu šo spēles darbību?
Yes. The last move since it ended the game by runaway score.
-
• Kas notika, kad veicāt šo darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Mozilla v5
-
• Kurā spēles solī problēma parādījās (kas bija tā brīža spēles instrukcija)?
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. -
• Kas notika, kad mēģinājāt veikt spēles darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?
Yes. The last move since it ended the game by runaway score.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Mozilla v5
-
• Lūdzu aprakstiet radušos problēmu. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. • Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Mozilla v5
-
• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. -
• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?
Yes. The last move since it ended the game by runaway score.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Mozilla v5
-
• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. • Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Mozilla v5
Ziņojuma vēsture
Russian was the dominant coalition. You were loyal to Russian.
You had 1pt for loyalty plus one patriot and one prize for three total points.
The Wakhan had 1pt for loyalty plus two prizes and one gift for four total points.
It is correct that the Wakhan score 5 and you score 3. It was not a tie.
The Wakhan only bought the gift the turn before so you may have missed this.
However, the summary scoring for the Wakhan does seem to be wrong. It shows only 3pts for Russian whereas it should show 4pts. The Afghan (2pt) and British (5pt) appear correct.
I’d look at move 68, for when she betrayed a card to gain a Russian patriot. That saw her summary score remain as 1, not increase to 2 as it should. She had only just radicalized that card as her first action in her turn and possibly that caused the error in her tally of influence, but I’m speculating.
Pievieno kaut ko šim ziņojumam
- Cita galda ID / gājiena ID
- Vai F5 atrisināja šo problēmu?
- Vai šī problēma parādās vairākas reizes? Katru reizi? Nekonkrētās reizēs?
- Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
