• Lūdzu nokopē/ielīmē kļūdas ziņu, ko redzi ekrānā, ja tāda ir.

A player rolled the barbarians and they attacked. One player had 5 active knights and another had 3 active knights giving us a defense strength of 8. There were 8 cities on the board, but the attack said there was only a defense of 6. I then lost my city. We should have won the barbarian attack and I should not have lost my city. I do not know why the game did this.

• Lūdzu paskaidro, ko Tu vēlējies darīt, ko Tu izdarīji un kas notika

Move 312.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

A player rolled the barbarians and they attacked. One player had 5 active knights and another had 3 active knights giving us a defense strength of 8. There were 8 cities on the board, but the attack said there was only a defense of 6. I then lost my city. We should have won the barbarian attack and I should not have lost my city. I do not know why the game did this.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

A player rolled the barbarians and they attacked. One player had 5 active knights and another had 3 active knights giving us a defense strength of 8. There were 8 cities on the board, but the attack said there was only a defense of 6. I then lost my city. We should have won the barbarian attack and I should not have lost my city. I do not know why the game did this.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kas tika attēlots ekrānā, kad Tu tiki bloķēts (tukšs ekrāns? Daļa no spēles interfeisa? Ziņa par kļūdu?)?

A player rolled the barbarians and they attacked. One player had 5 active knights and another had 3 active knights giving us a defense strength of 8. There were 8 cities on the board, but the attack said there was only a defense of 6. I then lost my city. We should have won the barbarian attack and I should not have lost my city. I do not know why the game did this.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kura noteikumu daļa netika ņemta vērā BGA versijā?

A player rolled the barbarians and they attacked. One player had 5 active knights and another had 3 active knights giving us a defense strength of 8. There were 8 cities on the board, but the attack said there was only a defense of 6. I then lost my city. We should have won the barbarian attack and I should not have lost my city. I do not know why the game did this.

• Vai noteikumu pārkāpums ir redzams spēles atkārtojumā? Ja jā, tad kurā gājienā?

Move 312.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kādu spēles darbību Tu vēlējies veikt?

A player rolled the barbarians and they attacked. One player had 5 active knights and another had 3 active knights giving us a defense strength of 8. There were 8 cities on the board, but the attack said there was only a defense of 6. I then lost my city. We should have won the barbarian attack and I should not have lost my city. I do not know why the game did this.

• Ko tu dari, lai panāktu šo spēles darbību?

Move 312.

• Kas notika, kad veicāt šo darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kurā spēles solī problēma parādījās (kas bija tā brīža spēles instrukcija)?

A player rolled the barbarians and they attacked. One player had 5 active knights and another had 3 active knights giving us a defense strength of 8. There were 8 cities on the board, but the attack said there was only a defense of 6. I then lost my city. We should have won the barbarian attack and I should not have lost my city. I do not know why the game did this.

• Kas notika, kad mēģinājāt veikt spēles darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

Move 312.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu aprakstiet radušos problēmu. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

A player rolled the barbarians and they attacked. One player had 5 active knights and another had 3 active knights giving us a defense strength of 8. There were 8 cities on the board, but the attack said there was only a defense of 6. I then lost my city. We should have won the barbarian attack and I should not have lost my city. I do not know why the game did this.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

A player rolled the barbarians and they attacked. One player had 5 active knights and another had 3 active knights giving us a defense strength of 8. There were 8 cities on the board, but the attack said there was only a defense of 6. I then lost my city. We should have won the barbarian attack and I should not have lost my city. I do not know why the game did this.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

A player rolled the barbarians and they attacked. One player had 5 active knights and another had 3 active knights giving us a defense strength of 8. There were 8 cities on the board, but the attack said there was only a defense of 6. I then lost my city. We should have won the barbarian attack and I should not have lost my city. I do not know why the game did this.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?