• Lūdzu nokopē/ielīmē kļūdas ziņu, ko redzi ekrānā, ja tāda ir.

Currently the available victory conditions are either 2 hands or the points system. I think offering 1 hand as an option would be good because it would make for a MUCH shorter game (and the game length would be lower variance). For example, I just played a 4-player 2-hands game which took 4 hands total, i.e. 2 hours. If we'd been unlucky, it could have been 5 hands (2.5 hours); it also could have been over in 2 hands (1 hour). This is both longer than I wanted to play, and also way higher variance (even if I'm ok with 1-2 hours, the *potential* of a 2.5hr game may prevent me from ever playing again even if it doesn't happen often).

• Lūdzu paskaidro, ko Tu vēlējies darīt, ko Tu izdarīji un kas notika

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

Currently the available victory conditions are either 2 hands or the points system. I think offering 1 hand as an option would be good because it would make for a MUCH shorter game (and the game length would be lower variance). For example, I just played a 4-player 2-hands game which took 4 hands total, i.e. 2 hours. If we'd been unlucky, it could have been 5 hands (2.5 hours); it also could have been over in 2 hands (1 hour). This is both longer than I wanted to play, and also way higher variance (even if I'm ok with 1-2 hours, the *potential* of a 2.5hr game may prevent me from ever playing again even if it doesn't happen often).

• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

Currently the available victory conditions are either 2 hands or the points system. I think offering 1 hand as an option would be good because it would make for a MUCH shorter game (and the game length would be lower variance). For example, I just played a 4-player 2-hands game which took 4 hands total, i.e. 2 hours. If we'd been unlucky, it could have been 5 hands (2.5 hours); it also could have been over in 2 hands (1 hour). This is both longer than I wanted to play, and also way higher variance (even if I'm ok with 1-2 hours, the *potential* of a 2.5hr game may prevent me from ever playing again even if it doesn't happen often).

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kas tika attēlots ekrānā, kad Tu tiki bloķēts (tukšs ekrāns? Daļa no spēles interfeisa? Ziņa par kļūdu?)?

Currently the available victory conditions are either 2 hands or the points system. I think offering 1 hand as an option would be good because it would make for a MUCH shorter game (and the game length would be lower variance). For example, I just played a 4-player 2-hands game which took 4 hands total, i.e. 2 hours. If we'd been unlucky, it could have been 5 hands (2.5 hours); it also could have been over in 2 hands (1 hour). This is both longer than I wanted to play, and also way higher variance (even if I'm ok with 1-2 hours, the *potential* of a 2.5hr game may prevent me from ever playing again even if it doesn't happen often).

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kura noteikumu daļa netika ņemta vērā BGA versijā?

Currently the available victory conditions are either 2 hands or the points system. I think offering 1 hand as an option would be good because it would make for a MUCH shorter game (and the game length would be lower variance). For example, I just played a 4-player 2-hands game which took 4 hands total, i.e. 2 hours. If we'd been unlucky, it could have been 5 hands (2.5 hours); it also could have been over in 2 hands (1 hour). This is both longer than I wanted to play, and also way higher variance (even if I'm ok with 1-2 hours, the *potential* of a 2.5hr game may prevent me from ever playing again even if it doesn't happen often).

• Vai noteikumu pārkāpums ir redzams spēles atkārtojumā? Ja jā, tad kurā gājienā?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kādu spēles darbību Tu vēlējies veikt?

Currently the available victory conditions are either 2 hands or the points system. I think offering 1 hand as an option would be good because it would make for a MUCH shorter game (and the game length would be lower variance). For example, I just played a 4-player 2-hands game which took 4 hands total, i.e. 2 hours. If we'd been unlucky, it could have been 5 hands (2.5 hours); it also could have been over in 2 hands (1 hour). This is both longer than I wanted to play, and also way higher variance (even if I'm ok with 1-2 hours, the *potential* of a 2.5hr game may prevent me from ever playing again even if it doesn't happen often).

• Ko tu dari, lai panāktu šo spēles darbību?

• Kas notika, kad veicāt šo darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kurā spēles solī problēma parādījās (kas bija tā brīža spēles instrukcija)?

Currently the available victory conditions are either 2 hands or the points system. I think offering 1 hand as an option would be good because it would make for a MUCH shorter game (and the game length would be lower variance). For example, I just played a 4-player 2-hands game which took 4 hands total, i.e. 2 hours. If we'd been unlucky, it could have been 5 hands (2.5 hours); it also could have been over in 2 hands (1 hour). This is both longer than I wanted to play, and also way higher variance (even if I'm ok with 1-2 hours, the *potential* of a 2.5hr game may prevent me from ever playing again even if it doesn't happen often).

• Kas notika, kad mēģinājāt veikt spēles darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu aprakstiet radušos problēmu. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

Currently the available victory conditions are either 2 hands or the points system. I think offering 1 hand as an option would be good because it would make for a MUCH shorter game (and the game length would be lower variance). For example, I just played a 4-player 2-hands game which took 4 hands total, i.e. 2 hours. If we'd been unlucky, it could have been 5 hands (2.5 hours); it also could have been over in 2 hands (1 hour). This is both longer than I wanted to play, and also way higher variance (even if I'm ok with 1-2 hours, the *potential* of a 2.5hr game may prevent me from ever playing again even if it doesn't happen often).

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

Currently the available victory conditions are either 2 hands or the points system. I think offering 1 hand as an option would be good because it would make for a MUCH shorter game (and the game length would be lower variance). For example, I just played a 4-player 2-hands game which took 4 hands total, i.e. 2 hours. If we'd been unlucky, it could have been 5 hands (2.5 hours); it also could have been over in 2 hands (1 hour). This is both longer than I wanted to play, and also way higher variance (even if I'm ok with 1-2 hours, the *potential* of a 2.5hr game may prevent me from ever playing again even if it doesn't happen often).

• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

Currently the available victory conditions are either 2 hands or the points system. I think offering 1 hand as an option would be good because it would make for a MUCH shorter game (and the game length would be lower variance). For example, I just played a 4-player 2-hands game which took 4 hands total, i.e. 2 hours. If we'd been unlucky, it could have been 5 hands (2.5 hours); it also could have been over in 2 hands (1 hour). This is both longer than I wanted to play, and also way higher variance (even if I'm ok with 1-2 hours, the *potential* of a 2.5hr game may prevent me from ever playing again even if it doesn't happen often).

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?