#141522: "As requested: Cards which didn't score correctly in my game"
Kāds ir šis ziņojums?
Kas notika? Lūdzu izvēlies no zemākredzamajiem
Kas notika? Lūdzu izvēlies no zemākredzamajiem
Lūdzu, pārbaudiet, vai par šo pašu tēmu jau ir ziņojums
Ja jā, lūdzu, balsojiet par šo ziņojumu. Ziņojumiem ar vislielākajām balsīm tiek dota PRIORITĀTE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detalizēts apraksts
-
• Lūdzu nokopē/ielīmē kļūdas ziņu, ko redzi ekrānā, ja tāda ir.
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
-
• Lūdzu paskaidro, ko Tu vēlējies darīt, ko Tu izdarīji un kas notika
Noted above inline.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
-
• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?
Noted above inline.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Kas tika attēlots ekrānā, kad Tu tiki bloķēts (tukšs ekrāns? Daļa no spēles interfeisa? Ziņa par kļūdu?)?
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Kura noteikumu daļa netika ņemta vērā BGA versijā?
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
-
• Vai noteikumu pārkāpums ir redzams spēles atkārtojumā? Ja jā, tad kurā gājienā?
Noted above inline.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Kādu spēles darbību Tu vēlējies veikt?
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
-
• Ko tu dari, lai panāktu šo spēles darbību?
Noted above inline.
-
• Kas notika, kad veicāt šo darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Kurā spēles solī problēma parādījās (kas bija tā brīža spēles instrukcija)?
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
-
• Kas notika, kad mēģinājāt veikt spēles darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?
Noted above inline.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Lūdzu aprakstiet radušos problēmu. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
-
• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?
Noted above inline.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?
Google Chrome v128
Ziņojuma vēsture
I will begin investigating this.
The pathing algorithm is arduous. I've rewritten it completely and it I still find insidious bugs like this on occasion.
Thank you for your detailed reporting. It helped tremendously.
As a retired software engineer, I can appreciate the complexities involved, and need for good detail in bug reports.
Some of these did not involve changes to the longest path, so I wonder it there might be other things to look at:
While moves 18 and 40 involved changes to the longest path at the time, AND were values that coincided with the path changes, moves 43, 48, and 55 increased the amount of missing points by 5 points at the same time a new berry should have been scoring pointing to a possible issue with berry scoring.
43 also involved changed to the sum for longest path, but 48, and 55 did not, although 55 did cover part of the width of a still counted path segment, but the increase in the score differential (5 vp) indicated a berry missed which was just added.
Hope this helps and curious if you think even 43, 48, and 55 would be fixed as it sounds like they may not be yet.
Since you're technically inclined, you may find it interested to open the browser javascript console and type TBP.players[93239080]["subscore"] to see a breakdown of your score at any point in the game or replay.
Pievieno kaut ko šim ziņojumam
- Cita galda ID / gājiena ID
- Vai F5 atrisināja šo problēmu?
- Vai šī problēma parādās vairākas reizes? Katru reizi? Nekonkrētās reizēs?
- Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.
