• Lūdzu nokopē/ielīmē kļūdas ziņu, ko redzi ekrānā, ja tāda ir.

We played a 4-player game of Hedgehog edition. In the first three rounds, different players won, and we entered round 4 with a 1-1-1-0 score, so three players had their caterpillar on the +2 side and the fourth player had their caterpillar on the +5 side.

In the fourth round, there was a tied score between one of the players with +2 and the player with the +5. According to the written rules, "If there is a tied score at the end of a round, the tied player who won the latest sale wins the round." But instead, it counted as a tie where both players "won" the round. So the scores were 2-1-1-1.

Somehow the game didn't end, and we played another round. Then the scores were 2-2-1-1 and the game actually ended.

• Lūdzu paskaidro, ko Tu vēlējies darīt, ko Tu izdarīji un kas notika

Move 137

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

We played a 4-player game of Hedgehog edition. In the first three rounds, different players won, and we entered round 4 with a 1-1-1-0 score, so three players had their caterpillar on the +2 side and the fourth player had their caterpillar on the +5 side.

In the fourth round, there was a tied score between one of the players with +2 and the player with the +5. According to the written rules, "If there is a tied score at the end of a round, the tied player who won the latest sale wins the round." But instead, it counted as a tie where both players "won" the round. So the scores were 2-1-1-1.

Somehow the game didn't end, and we played another round. Then the scores were 2-2-1-1 and the game actually ended.

• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

Move 137

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

We played a 4-player game of Hedgehog edition. In the first three rounds, different players won, and we entered round 4 with a 1-1-1-0 score, so three players had their caterpillar on the +2 side and the fourth player had their caterpillar on the +5 side.

In the fourth round, there was a tied score between one of the players with +2 and the player with the +5. According to the written rules, "If there is a tied score at the end of a round, the tied player who won the latest sale wins the round." But instead, it counted as a tie where both players "won" the round. So the scores were 2-1-1-1.

Somehow the game didn't end, and we played another round. Then the scores were 2-2-1-1 and the game actually ended.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kas tika attēlots ekrānā, kad Tu tiki bloķēts (tukšs ekrāns? Daļa no spēles interfeisa? Ziņa par kļūdu?)?

We played a 4-player game of Hedgehog edition. In the first three rounds, different players won, and we entered round 4 with a 1-1-1-0 score, so three players had their caterpillar on the +2 side and the fourth player had their caterpillar on the +5 side.

In the fourth round, there was a tied score between one of the players with +2 and the player with the +5. According to the written rules, "If there is a tied score at the end of a round, the tied player who won the latest sale wins the round." But instead, it counted as a tie where both players "won" the round. So the scores were 2-1-1-1.

Somehow the game didn't end, and we played another round. Then the scores were 2-2-1-1 and the game actually ended.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kura noteikumu daļa netika ņemta vērā BGA versijā?

We played a 4-player game of Hedgehog edition. In the first three rounds, different players won, and we entered round 4 with a 1-1-1-0 score, so three players had their caterpillar on the +2 side and the fourth player had their caterpillar on the +5 side.

In the fourth round, there was a tied score between one of the players with +2 and the player with the +5. According to the written rules, "If there is a tied score at the end of a round, the tied player who won the latest sale wins the round." But instead, it counted as a tie where both players "won" the round. So the scores were 2-1-1-1.

Somehow the game didn't end, and we played another round. Then the scores were 2-2-1-1 and the game actually ended.

• Vai noteikumu pārkāpums ir redzams spēles atkārtojumā? Ja jā, tad kurā gājienā?

Move 137

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kādu spēles darbību Tu vēlējies veikt?

We played a 4-player game of Hedgehog edition. In the first three rounds, different players won, and we entered round 4 with a 1-1-1-0 score, so three players had their caterpillar on the +2 side and the fourth player had their caterpillar on the +5 side.

In the fourth round, there was a tied score between one of the players with +2 and the player with the +5. According to the written rules, "If there is a tied score at the end of a round, the tied player who won the latest sale wins the round." But instead, it counted as a tie where both players "won" the round. So the scores were 2-1-1-1.

Somehow the game didn't end, and we played another round. Then the scores were 2-2-1-1 and the game actually ended.

• Ko tu dari, lai panāktu šo spēles darbību?

Move 137

• Kas notika, kad veicāt šo darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kurā spēles solī problēma parādījās (kas bija tā brīža spēles instrukcija)?

We played a 4-player game of Hedgehog edition. In the first three rounds, different players won, and we entered round 4 with a 1-1-1-0 score, so three players had their caterpillar on the +2 side and the fourth player had their caterpillar on the +5 side.

In the fourth round, there was a tied score between one of the players with +2 and the player with the +5. According to the written rules, "If there is a tied score at the end of a round, the tied player who won the latest sale wins the round." But instead, it counted as a tie where both players "won" the round. So the scores were 2-1-1-1.

Somehow the game didn't end, and we played another round. Then the scores were 2-2-1-1 and the game actually ended.

• Kas notika, kad mēģinājāt veikt spēles darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

Move 137

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu aprakstiet radušos problēmu. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

We played a 4-player game of Hedgehog edition. In the first three rounds, different players won, and we entered round 4 with a 1-1-1-0 score, so three players had their caterpillar on the +2 side and the fourth player had their caterpillar on the +5 side.

In the fourth round, there was a tied score between one of the players with +2 and the player with the +5. According to the written rules, "If there is a tied score at the end of a round, the tied player who won the latest sale wins the round." But instead, it counted as a tie where both players "won" the round. So the scores were 2-1-1-1.

Somehow the game didn't end, and we played another round. Then the scores were 2-2-1-1 and the game actually ended.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

We played a 4-player game of Hedgehog edition. In the first three rounds, different players won, and we entered round 4 with a 1-1-1-0 score, so three players had their caterpillar on the +2 side and the fourth player had their caterpillar on the +5 side.

In the fourth round, there was a tied score between one of the players with +2 and the player with the +5. According to the written rules, "If there is a tied score at the end of a round, the tied player who won the latest sale wins the round." But instead, it counted as a tie where both players "won" the round. So the scores were 2-1-1-1.

Somehow the game didn't end, and we played another round. Then the scores were 2-2-1-1 and the game actually ended.

• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

Move 137

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

We played a 4-player game of Hedgehog edition. In the first three rounds, different players won, and we entered round 4 with a 1-1-1-0 score, so three players had their caterpillar on the +2 side and the fourth player had their caterpillar on the +5 side.

In the fourth round, there was a tied score between one of the players with +2 and the player with the +5. According to the written rules, "If there is a tied score at the end of a round, the tied player who won the latest sale wins the round." But instead, it counted as a tie where both players "won" the round. So the scores were 2-1-1-1.

Somehow the game didn't end, and we played another round. Then the scores were 2-2-1-1 and the game actually ended.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?