• Lūdzu nokopē/ielīmē kļūdas ziņu, ko redzi ekrānā, ja tāda ir.

This card is difficult to understand the way it is worded.

The current wording is ambiguous and makes it sounds like you score 13 points, but that you also score one less point for each of your Theme tag scores; so 4 red tags would only score 3 points instead of 4. It's as if you are making a sacrifice in your theme score so that you can score the 13 points of this card.

Instead of the current wording, I would suggest something like," This card is worth one point less for each Theme tag you have in play." Or, if you want to go more minimal: "Subtract one point from your final score for each Theme tag."

If you cannot change the graphics on the card it would be easy and helpful to include in the card's hover overlay (see the other suggestion report regarding card overlays being helpful for players).

• Lūdzu paskaidro, ko Tu vēlējies darīt, ko Tu izdarīji un kas notika

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

This card is difficult to understand the way it is worded.

The current wording is ambiguous and makes it sounds like you score 13 points, but that you also score one less point for each of your Theme tag scores; so 4 red tags would only score 3 points instead of 4. It's as if you are making a sacrifice in your theme score so that you can score the 13 points of this card.

Instead of the current wording, I would suggest something like," This card is worth one point less for each Theme tag you have in play." Or, if you want to go more minimal: "Subtract one point from your final score for each Theme tag."

If you cannot change the graphics on the card it would be easy and helpful to include in the card's hover overlay (see the other suggestion report regarding card overlays being helpful for players).

• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

This card is difficult to understand the way it is worded.

The current wording is ambiguous and makes it sounds like you score 13 points, but that you also score one less point for each of your Theme tag scores; so 4 red tags would only score 3 points instead of 4. It's as if you are making a sacrifice in your theme score so that you can score the 13 points of this card.

Instead of the current wording, I would suggest something like," This card is worth one point less for each Theme tag you have in play." Or, if you want to go more minimal: "Subtract one point from your final score for each Theme tag."

If you cannot change the graphics on the card it would be easy and helpful to include in the card's hover overlay (see the other suggestion report regarding card overlays being helpful for players).

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kas tika attēlots ekrānā, kad Tu tiki bloķēts (tukšs ekrāns? Daļa no spēles interfeisa? Ziņa par kļūdu?)?

This card is difficult to understand the way it is worded.

The current wording is ambiguous and makes it sounds like you score 13 points, but that you also score one less point for each of your Theme tag scores; so 4 red tags would only score 3 points instead of 4. It's as if you are making a sacrifice in your theme score so that you can score the 13 points of this card.

Instead of the current wording, I would suggest something like," This card is worth one point less for each Theme tag you have in play." Or, if you want to go more minimal: "Subtract one point from your final score for each Theme tag."

If you cannot change the graphics on the card it would be easy and helpful to include in the card's hover overlay (see the other suggestion report regarding card overlays being helpful for players).

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kura noteikumu daļa netika ņemta vērā BGA versijā?

This card is difficult to understand the way it is worded.

The current wording is ambiguous and makes it sounds like you score 13 points, but that you also score one less point for each of your Theme tag scores; so 4 red tags would only score 3 points instead of 4. It's as if you are making a sacrifice in your theme score so that you can score the 13 points of this card.

Instead of the current wording, I would suggest something like," This card is worth one point less for each Theme tag you have in play." Or, if you want to go more minimal: "Subtract one point from your final score for each Theme tag."

If you cannot change the graphics on the card it would be easy and helpful to include in the card's hover overlay (see the other suggestion report regarding card overlays being helpful for players).

• Vai noteikumu pārkāpums ir redzams spēles atkārtojumā? Ja jā, tad kurā gājienā?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kādu spēles darbību Tu vēlējies veikt?

This card is difficult to understand the way it is worded.

The current wording is ambiguous and makes it sounds like you score 13 points, but that you also score one less point for each of your Theme tag scores; so 4 red tags would only score 3 points instead of 4. It's as if you are making a sacrifice in your theme score so that you can score the 13 points of this card.

Instead of the current wording, I would suggest something like," This card is worth one point less for each Theme tag you have in play." Or, if you want to go more minimal: "Subtract one point from your final score for each Theme tag."

If you cannot change the graphics on the card it would be easy and helpful to include in the card's hover overlay (see the other suggestion report regarding card overlays being helpful for players).

• Ko tu dari, lai panāktu šo spēles darbību?

• Kas notika, kad veicāt šo darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kurā spēles solī problēma parādījās (kas bija tā brīža spēles instrukcija)?

This card is difficult to understand the way it is worded.

The current wording is ambiguous and makes it sounds like you score 13 points, but that you also score one less point for each of your Theme tag scores; so 4 red tags would only score 3 points instead of 4. It's as if you are making a sacrifice in your theme score so that you can score the 13 points of this card.

Instead of the current wording, I would suggest something like," This card is worth one point less for each Theme tag you have in play." Or, if you want to go more minimal: "Subtract one point from your final score for each Theme tag."

If you cannot change the graphics on the card it would be easy and helpful to include in the card's hover overlay (see the other suggestion report regarding card overlays being helpful for players).

• Kas notika, kad mēģinājāt veikt spēles darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu aprakstiet radušos problēmu. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

This card is difficult to understand the way it is worded.

The current wording is ambiguous and makes it sounds like you score 13 points, but that you also score one less point for each of your Theme tag scores; so 4 red tags would only score 3 points instead of 4. It's as if you are making a sacrifice in your theme score so that you can score the 13 points of this card.

Instead of the current wording, I would suggest something like," This card is worth one point less for each Theme tag you have in play." Or, if you want to go more minimal: "Subtract one point from your final score for each Theme tag."

If you cannot change the graphics on the card it would be easy and helpful to include in the card's hover overlay (see the other suggestion report regarding card overlays being helpful for players).

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

This card is difficult to understand the way it is worded.

The current wording is ambiguous and makes it sounds like you score 13 points, but that you also score one less point for each of your Theme tag scores; so 4 red tags would only score 3 points instead of 4. It's as if you are making a sacrifice in your theme score so that you can score the 13 points of this card.

Instead of the current wording, I would suggest something like," This card is worth one point less for each Theme tag you have in play." Or, if you want to go more minimal: "Subtract one point from your final score for each Theme tag."

If you cannot change the graphics on the card it would be easy and helpful to include in the card's hover overlay (see the other suggestion report regarding card overlays being helpful for players).

• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

This card is difficult to understand the way it is worded.

The current wording is ambiguous and makes it sounds like you score 13 points, but that you also score one less point for each of your Theme tag scores; so 4 red tags would only score 3 points instead of 4. It's as if you are making a sacrifice in your theme score so that you can score the 13 points of this card.

Instead of the current wording, I would suggest something like," This card is worth one point less for each Theme tag you have in play." Or, if you want to go more minimal: "Subtract one point from your final score for each Theme tag."

If you cannot change the graphics on the card it would be easy and helpful to include in the card's hover overlay (see the other suggestion report regarding card overlays being helpful for players).

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?