• Lūdzu nokopē/ielīmē kļūdas ziņu, ko redzi ekrānā, ja tāda ir.

I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:

A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg

This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.

So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2

• Lūdzu paskaidro, ko Tu vēlējies darīt, ko Tu izdarīji un kas notika

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:

A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg

This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.

So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2

• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:

A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg

This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.

So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kas tika attēlots ekrānā, kad Tu tiki bloķēts (tukšs ekrāns? Daļa no spēles interfeisa? Ziņa par kļūdu?)?

I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:

A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg

This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.

So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kura noteikumu daļa netika ņemta vērā BGA versijā?

I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:

A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg

This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.

So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2

• Vai noteikumu pārkāpums ir redzams spēles atkārtojumā? Ja jā, tad kurā gājienā?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kādu spēles darbību Tu vēlējies veikt?

I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:

A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg

This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.

So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2

• Ko tu dari, lai panāktu šo spēles darbību?

• Kas notika, kad veicāt šo darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kurā spēles solī problēma parādījās (kas bija tā brīža spēles instrukcija)?

I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:

A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg

This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.

So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2

• Kas notika, kad mēģinājāt veikt spēles darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu aprakstiet radušos problēmu. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:

A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg

This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.

So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:

A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg

This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.

So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2

• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:

A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg

This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.

So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?