• Lūdzu nokopē/ielīmē kļūdas ziņu, ko redzi ekrānā, ja tāda ir.

I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.

Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...

The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.

So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.

Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.

Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.

This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.

This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.

• Lūdzu paskaidro, ko Tu vēlējies darīt, ko Tu izdarīji un kas notika

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.

Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...

The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.

So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.

Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.

Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.

This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.

This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.

• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.

Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...

The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.

So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.

Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.

Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.

This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.

This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kas tika attēlots ekrānā, kad Tu tiki bloķēts (tukšs ekrāns? Daļa no spēles interfeisa? Ziņa par kļūdu?)?

I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.

Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...

The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.

So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.

Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.

Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.

This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.

This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kura noteikumu daļa netika ņemta vērā BGA versijā?

I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.

Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...

The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.

So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.

Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.

Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.

This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.

This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.

• Vai noteikumu pārkāpums ir redzams spēles atkārtojumā? Ja jā, tad kurā gājienā?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kādu spēles darbību Tu vēlējies veikt?

I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.

Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...

The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.

So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.

Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.

Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.

This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.

This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.

• Ko tu dari, lai panāktu šo spēles darbību?

• Kas notika, kad veicāt šo darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kurā spēles solī problēma parādījās (kas bija tā brīža spēles instrukcija)?

I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.

Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...

The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.

So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.

Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.

Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.

This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.

This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.

• Kas notika, kad mēģinājāt veikt spēles darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu aprakstiet radušos problēmu. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.

Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...

The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.

So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.

Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.

Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.

This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.

This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.

Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...

The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.

So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.

Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.

Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.

This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.

This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.

• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

I looked at a bug report and saw that it was non-bug due a lack of knowledge about one of the tiles.

Problem is that with this implementation, it's not obvious which tiles have been placed and it is therefore not obvious which tiles we should lookup in the rules before playing...

The implementation already tells us where quests will appear on the next round but that is not all the relevant information on the setup card.

So it would be nice to be able to see that setup card. Possibly with it only showing the parts that are applicable to the number of players in the game.

Alternatively, or in addition to that, the descriptive in the game options could (and IMO should) list those tiles.

Currently, when selecting hard mode when creating the game, I just see a short:
La mise en place avancée modifie la mise en place normale en ajoutant un nouveau lieu et un nouveau combat.

This could contain much more information:
- list explicitly the added cities and (compared to easy mode or to normal mode but I think I would prefer to easy mode)
-- and put in parenthesis the location number and tile so people can look it up in the rules
- list added combats options (Silver Fleet, Golden Mine) also with the relevant tiles code in ()
...
And maybe even add explicitly that players should lookup those tiles in the rules before playing.

This serves two purposes:
- might reduced the risk of non-bug reports
- will help those who don't own the game to choose between the different scenarios.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?