• Lūdzu nokopē/ielīmē kļūdas ziņu, ko redzi ekrānā, ja tāda ir.

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Lūdzu paskaidro, ko Tu vēlējies darīt, ko Tu izdarīji un kas notika

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kas tika attēlots ekrānā, kad Tu tiki bloķēts (tukšs ekrāns? Daļa no spēles interfeisa? Ziņa par kļūdu?)?

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kura noteikumu daļa netika ņemta vērā BGA versijā?

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Vai noteikumu pārkāpums ir redzams spēles atkārtojumā? Ja jā, tad kurā gājienā?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kādu spēles darbību Tu vēlējies veikt?

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Ko tu dari, lai panāktu šo spēles darbību?

• Kas notika, kad veicāt šo darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kurā spēles solī problēma parādījās (kas bija tā brīža spēles instrukcija)?

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Kas notika, kad mēģinājāt veikt spēles darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu aprakstiet radušos problēmu. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.

This would satisfy a number of important criteria:

- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game

I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654

There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?