• Lūdzu nokopē/ielīmē kļūdas ziņu, ko redzi ekrānā, ja tāda ir.

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Lūdzu paskaidro, ko Tu vēlējies darīt, ko Tu izdarīji un kas notika

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kas tika attēlots ekrānā, kad Tu tiki bloķēts (tukšs ekrāns? Daļa no spēles interfeisa? Ziņa par kļūdu?)?

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kura noteikumu daļa netika ņemta vērā BGA versijā?

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Vai noteikumu pārkāpums ir redzams spēles atkārtojumā? Ja jā, tad kurā gājienā?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kādu spēles darbību Tu vēlējies veikt?

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Ko tu dari, lai panāktu šo spēles darbību?

• Kas notika, kad veicāt šo darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kurā spēles solī problēma parādījās (kas bija tā brīža spēles instrukcija)?

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Kas notika, kad mēģinājāt veikt spēles darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu aprakstiet radušos problēmu. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. Ja Tev ir ekrānuzņēmums, kurā redzama kļūme (laba prakse), vari izmantot Imgur.com , lai to augšupielādētu un kopētu/ielīmētu saiti šeit.

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?