• Lūdzu nokopē/ielīmē kļūdas ziņu, ko redzi ekrānā, ja tāda ir.

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Lūdzu paskaidro, ko Tu vēlējies darīt, ko Tu izdarīji un kas notika

End of game standings

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kas tika attēlots ekrānā, kad Tu tiki bloķēts (tukšs ekrāns? Daļa no spēles interfeisa? Ziņa par kļūdu?)?

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kura noteikumu daļa netika ņemta vērā BGA versijā?

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Vai noteikumu pārkāpums ir redzams spēles atkārtojumā? Ja jā, tad kurā gājienā?

End of game standings

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kādu spēles darbību Tu vēlējies veikt?

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Ko tu dari, lai panāktu šo spēles darbību?

End of game standings

• Kas notika, kad veicāt šo darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Kurā spēles solī problēma parādījās (kas bija tā brīža spēles instrukcija)?

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Kas notika, kad mēģinājāt veikt spēles darbību (kļūdas paziņojums, spēles informācijas paziņojums,...)?

End of game standings

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu aprakstiet radušos problēmu. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu iekopē tekstu, kas redzams angļu, nevis tavā valodā. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Vai šis teksts ir pieejams tulkošanas sistēmā? Ja jā, vai tas ir ticis tulkots pēdējo 24 stundu laikā?

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?

• Lūdzu, paskaidrojiet savu ieteikumu precīzi un kodolīgi, lai tas būtu pēc iespējas vieglāk saprotams.

When two players have the same number of coins at the end of the game, the player who scored more points on the last round is considered to beat the player who scored fewer points.

In this game, the instant win card (least frequent > most frequent) happened, and a player won. The other two players had 2 coins each at the time. At the end of the game scoreboard, both players were listed as having 0 coins in the last round. It's unclear to me whether the last round should have been the round in which the instant win card was played or the round before, but in neither case did both players have 0 coins. (Also worth noting - nobody was awarded coins that round, which is probably intentional?).

When the instant win card is successfully played, the game should use the tiebreaker (either from the current round or the previous) rather than randomly assigning placement.

• Kāda ir Tava pārlūkprogramma?